A comprehensive analysis of the human placenta transcriptome.
Journal: 2014/October - Placenta
ISSN: 1532-3102
Abstract:
As the conduit for nutrients and growth signals, the placenta is critical to establishing an environment sufficient for fetal growth and development. To better understand the mechanisms regulating placental development and gene expression, we characterized the transcriptome of term placenta from 20 healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies using RNA-seq. To identify genes that were highly expressed and unique to the placenta we compared placental RNA-seq data to data from 7 other tissues (adipose, breast, hear, kidney, liver, lung, and smooth muscle) and identified several genes novel to placental biology (QSOX1, DLG5, and SEMA7A). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR confirmed the RNA-seq results and immunohistochemistry indicated these proteins were highly expressed in the placental syncytium. Additionally, we mined our RNA-seq data to map the relative expression of key developmental gene families (Fox, Sox, Gata, Tead, and Wnt) within the placenta. We identified FOXO4, GATA3, and WNT7A to be amongst the highest expressed members of these families. Overall, these findings provide a new reference for understanding of placental transcriptome and can aid in the identification of novel pathways regulating placenta physiology that may be dysregulated in placental disease.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(15)
References
(35)
Chemicals
(9)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(4)
Anatomy
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Placenta 35(2): 125-131

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Human Placenta Transcriptome

INTRODUCTION

The placenta is a specialized temporary fetal organ that is requisite for fetal growth and development in eutherian mammals and is crucial for a successful pregnancy. Early in pregnancy the placenta is responsible for implantation, anchoring of the embryo into the uterine wall, and producing hormones that initiate maternal recognition of pregnancy. Throughout gestation, placental development proceeds via an elegantly orchestrated regulation of trophoblast invasion, proliferation and differentiation, as well as, vasculogenesis and angiogenesis to ensure adequate blood supply to support placental and fetal growth. Thereafter, the placenta provides the sole conduit for transferring maternally derived nutrients and gasses to the ever-demanding fetus.

Disruptions to placental development in the first half of pregnancy and/or insufficient adaptive changes in the placenta in response to maternal environment during the latter half of pregnancy have been associated with a number of pregnancy complications and compromised fetal outcomes. In this context, defining placenta specific gene expression can contribute to the understanding of placenta development and function. Unlike microarrays, which have been the primary tool to-date to study placental gene expression [13] [4], RNA-seq allows digital quantitation of gene expression data and hence allows assessment of relative abundance between genes within and between samples. Here, we set out to identify genes that are specific to human placenta using deep sequencing technology in order to increase general understanding of placental function and development.

METHODS

Collection of term placental samples

Placenta were collected at term at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences following informed consent from mothers. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at UAMS ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01104454","term_id":"NCT01104454"}}NCT01104454). Included in this study were non-smoking mothers without gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia or other complications who had either vaginal or cesarean deliveries (Table 1).

Table 1

Maternal Characteristics

Mean ± SE[Min, Max]
n20---
Age (yrs.)29.2 ± 1.4[18, 43]
Weight (Ib.)179.7 ± 11.5[110, 277]
Height (in.)65.6 ± 0.7[60, 72]
BMI (kg/m)29.3 ± 1.8[18.3, 43.4]
Parity (n)2.1 ± 0.3[0, 5]
Placenta Weight (g)659 ± 29.1[459, 951]
C-Section (n)11---
Fetal sex7-F, 13-M---

n = number, F = female, M = male

Preparation, sequencing, and data analysis of RNA-seq libraries

Total RNA was isolated from 20 placenta (pooled from 6 separate locations) using RNeasy columns [5] including DNase digestion. cDNA libraries were prepared using NebNext reagents as previously described [5]. Single-read 36-bp sequencing was performed using a GAIIX (Illumina). RNA-seq data for other tissues (liver, skeletal muscle, adipose, kidney, lung breast, and heart) were acquired in FASTQ format from the Illumina BodyMap 2.0 project. Alignment to the human genome (hg19) was carried out using Bowtie [6]. All data were analyzed in Avadis-NGS and SeqMonk software packages. Uniquely aligned reads were quantified in Avadis-NGS and gene-level reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) values were calculated. Pair-wise comparisons between placenta and individual tissues were carried out (p <0.05, Audic-claverie test; and 3-fold higher expression in placenta). Corrections for multiple testing were performed using the false discovery rate method [7]. The intersection of these comparisons was used for hierarchical clustering using R-Bioconductor and for functional enrichment using TargetMine. Visualizations were performed using Circos [8].

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from placenta as described above while RNA for other tissues was obtained commercially from Clontech (#636643, #636576, and #636558, Mountain View, CA), Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed using IScript cDNA synthesis kit, and subsequent real-time PCR analysis was performed using an ABI Prism 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene specific primers were designed using Primer Express Software (Applied Biosystems) for QSOX1 (forward: 5’-GACTGTGCTGAGGAGACCAACA-3’, reverse: 5’-CCCGAGCCGTTCTTGGTAA-3’), DLG5 (forward: 5’-AAGGCGGAACGCATTAAAATC-3’, reverse: 5’-TGCATTCAGAATGTGACACTGAAC-4’) and SEMA7A (forward: 5’-TCATGTCCCGAGACCCCTACT-3’, reverse: 5’-GTGTGGCTCGGCTGGATTAAT-3’). The relative amounts of mRNA were quantified using the ΔCT method and normalized to the expression of cyclophilin A mRNA [5].

Immunohistochemistry

Placenta tissues were fixed over-night in 3% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated through 5–15% sucrose, and frozen in OCT. Five micron sections were air dried and subjected to antigen retrieval (#45080-9K, Biogenex, San Ramon, CA). Immunolocalization was carried out using VectaStain Elite reagents (Vector labs). Briefly, sections were blocked with either rabbit or goat serum, followed by incubation with primary antibodies: QSOX1 #HPA042127 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO); DLG5 #ab56492 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); SEMA7A #sc-374432 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); FoxO4 #9472 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); GATA-3 #sc-9009 (Santa Cruz Bio.); Wnt-7a #HPA015719 (Sigma). Primary antibodies were used at 1:100 concentrations. Controls excluding primary antibodies were used for all staining procedures. Incubations were carried out for 2 h at room temperature. Visualization of staining was performed using diaminobenzadine (Dako).

Collection of term placental samples

Placenta were collected at term at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences following informed consent from mothers. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at UAMS ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01104454","term_id":"NCT01104454"}}NCT01104454). Included in this study were non-smoking mothers without gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia or other complications who had either vaginal or cesarean deliveries (Table 1).

Table 1

Maternal Characteristics

Mean ± SE[Min, Max]
n20---
Age (yrs.)29.2 ± 1.4[18, 43]
Weight (Ib.)179.7 ± 11.5[110, 277]
Height (in.)65.6 ± 0.7[60, 72]
BMI (kg/m)29.3 ± 1.8[18.3, 43.4]
Parity (n)2.1 ± 0.3[0, 5]
Placenta Weight (g)659 ± 29.1[459, 951]
C-Section (n)11---
Fetal sex7-F, 13-M---

n = number, F = female, M = male

Preparation, sequencing, and data analysis of RNA-seq libraries

Total RNA was isolated from 20 placenta (pooled from 6 separate locations) using RNeasy columns [5] including DNase digestion. cDNA libraries were prepared using NebNext reagents as previously described [5]. Single-read 36-bp sequencing was performed using a GAIIX (Illumina). RNA-seq data for other tissues (liver, skeletal muscle, adipose, kidney, lung breast, and heart) were acquired in FASTQ format from the Illumina BodyMap 2.0 project. Alignment to the human genome (hg19) was carried out using Bowtie [6]. All data were analyzed in Avadis-NGS and SeqMonk software packages. Uniquely aligned reads were quantified in Avadis-NGS and gene-level reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) values were calculated. Pair-wise comparisons between placenta and individual tissues were carried out (p <0.05, Audic-claverie test; and 3-fold higher expression in placenta). Corrections for multiple testing were performed using the false discovery rate method [7]. The intersection of these comparisons was used for hierarchical clustering using R-Bioconductor and for functional enrichment using TargetMine. Visualizations were performed using Circos [8].

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from placenta as described above while RNA for other tissues was obtained commercially from Clontech (#636643, #636576, and #636558, Mountain View, CA), Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed using IScript cDNA synthesis kit, and subsequent real-time PCR analysis was performed using an ABI Prism 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene specific primers were designed using Primer Express Software (Applied Biosystems) for QSOX1 (forward: 5’-GACTGTGCTGAGGAGACCAACA-3’, reverse: 5’-CCCGAGCCGTTCTTGGTAA-3’), DLG5 (forward: 5’-AAGGCGGAACGCATTAAAATC-3’, reverse: 5’-TGCATTCAGAATGTGACACTGAAC-4’) and SEMA7A (forward: 5’-TCATGTCCCGAGACCCCTACT-3’, reverse: 5’-GTGTGGCTCGGCTGGATTAAT-3’). The relative amounts of mRNA were quantified using the ΔCT method and normalized to the expression of cyclophilin A mRNA [5].

Immunohistochemistry

Placenta tissues were fixed over-night in 3% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated through 5–15% sucrose, and frozen in OCT. Five micron sections were air dried and subjected to antigen retrieval (#45080-9K, Biogenex, San Ramon, CA). Immunolocalization was carried out using VectaStain Elite reagents (Vector labs). Briefly, sections were blocked with either rabbit or goat serum, followed by incubation with primary antibodies: QSOX1 #HPA042127 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO); DLG5 #ab56492 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); SEMA7A #sc-374432 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); FoxO4 #9472 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); GATA-3 #sc-9009 (Santa Cruz Bio.); Wnt-7a #HPA015719 (Sigma). Primary antibodies were used at 1:100 concentrations. Controls excluding primary antibodies were used for all staining procedures. Incubations were carried out for 2 h at room temperature. Visualization of staining was performed using diaminobenzadine (Dako).

RESULTS and DISCUSSION

This dataset included ~200 million reads covering 20 biological replicates. Quantitation of reads over genes revealed that ~80% of all annotated UCSC genes had at least one read and ~54% showed RPKM values > 1. We ranked genes based on transcript abundance in the placenta (top 100 shown in track 2 of Figure 1A). High-resolution images are provided in supplementary material. Consistent with a previous study where microarray analysis was used to find placental specific genes [2], many of the top expressed placental genes have been shown to regulate placental and fetal growth and have been identified as markers for placental diseases. For example H19 and IGF2, both imprinted genes that produce potent growth factors [9], had a RPKM of > 1000. HTRA1 was also highly expressed with a RPKM of ~300. HTRA1 encodes a peptidase that may play a role in the regulation of IGF bioavailability by cleaving IGF-binding proteins [10] and is dysregulated in trophoblastic diseases [11] Additionally, GDF15 is a transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) cytokine that has implications in cardiovascular disease and has been identified to be dysregulated in pre-eclamptic and diabetic pregnancies [12]. GDF15 also had a RPKM of >1000 and was within the top 20 expressed genes in the placenta.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms545170f1.jpg
RNA-seq of human term placenta (n=20)

A) Circos diagram depicting whole-genome RNA-seq data. Track 1: cytoband, chromosomes are depicted qter to pter. Track 2: Genomic location of top 100 highly expressed genes in placenta based on average RPKM values. Gene names in red represent genes specifically enriched in placenta. Track 3: Average RPKM values summarized over 6 MB regions showing regions of high gene expression. Track 4: Locations of genes related to placenta in the OMIM database. Track 5: Genes specifically enriched in placenta (3-fold over 7 other tissues); Track 6: Biological functions enriched among placenta-enriched genes. High-resolution images are provided in supplementary material. B) Hierarchical clustering of the 288 genes that were at least 3-fold higher and had an RPKM >1 in the placenta compared to liver, heart, smooth muscle, adipose, breast, kidney, and lung. High expression is represented in red and low expression in blue.

Previous reports have suggested that placenta-specific transcripts in maternal circulation might serve as biomarkers for placental dysfunction [13, 14]. Hence, we utilized our data to identify genes uniquely enriched in placenta (>3-fold higher) relative to 7 other tissues. This analysis identified 285 genes of which top 50 are presented in Table 2 and tracks 2 and 5 of Figure 1A. Hierarchical clustering of these genes is presented in Figure 1B. TargetMine analysis showed that placenta-enriched genes functionally represented adaptive immunity, immune response, interferon signaling, focal adhesion and cell cycle, among other processes, classically associated with placental function (Track 6, Figure 1). Several genes novel to placental biology were identified: IFI6 (interferon α–inducible protein 6), QSOX1 (quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase-1), DLG5 (Discs large homologue 5), and SEMA7A (semaphoring-7a), (Table 2).

Table 2

Top 50 genes uniquely enriched in placenta

Gene IDGene SymbolPlacentaAdiposeBreastHeartKidneyLiverLungSmooth Muscle
283120H194354.5270.6245.065.752.328.627.2660.0
3481IGF21527.789.063.116.315.176.011.718.4
9518GDF151337.513.40.50.324.70.425.72.6
2192FBLN1606.866.336.818.313.51.2128.39.4
3048HBG2586.80.544.80.40.00.047.30.0
6513SLC2A1463.24.92.14.79.10.37.91.0
191585PLAC4458.30.20.20.10.10.00.10.0
6382SDC1446.01.15.70.185.9100.825.40.0
2537IFI6367.115.127.018.321.717.297.54.7
3880KRT19339.11.638.40.253.30.856.00.1
5654HTRA1307.150.397.213.439.599.621.48.8
3856KRT8283.01.416.18.759.150.258.30.1
10272FSTL3256.415.628.67.711.11.537.10.6
4320MMP11249.40.70.41.40.30.00.30.2
1441CSF3R246.54.20.70.40.40.816.80.3
5228PGF243.46.01.81.51.11.31.90.7
2896GRN239.666.350.818.237.321.773.314.0
124935SLC43A2236.87.15.60.610.30.55.59.6
1028CDKN1C229.837.622.412.453.42.113.115.7
649BMP1203.35.53.70.83.42.51.80.7
5270SERPINE2201.616.93.34.518.20.97.40.2
9022CLIC3190.40.20.60.60.40.110.10.2
3875KRT18185.02.711.81.245.057.565.60.8
9506PAGE4178.40.00.00.00.30.00.00.0
23089PEG10172.71.05.60.33.10.55.70.8
7975MAFK171.317.47.37.04.41.625.517.5
10912GADD45G158.92.11.24.45.311.53.26.3
64855FAM129B158.110.710.65.016.42.550.72.1
54507ADAMTSL4156.810.55.24.51.52.09.35.1
23764MAFF143.848.99.72.81.91.550.325.2
827CAPN6142.50.11.40.03.40.10.30.2
7262PHLDA2141.31.11.70.20.90.53.50.4
58190CTDSP1138.737.929.913.129.722.619.518.8
5768QSOX1133.715.811.016.314.09.849.68.2
3074HEXB127.937.031.229.428.527.843.116.9
1082CGB121.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
6625SNRNP70118.324.621.49.322.110.337.412.1
79586CHPF102.73.95.210.47.815.210.15.6
9231DLG5100.04.84.11.43.20.53.16.0
8482SEMA7A97.80.40.60.10.30.19.50.2
55194FAM176B96.79.96.91.56.71.111.21.3
4303FOXO494.616.214.08.45.42.19.625.5
5590PRKCZ91.00.31.02.25.91.413.00.2
85360SYDE189.56.65.02.34.30.74.10.8
114336CGB284.10.00.10.00.00.00.00.1
6484ST3GAL483.76.65.57.012.311.413.70.9
64787EPS8L277.60.93.00.114.68.67.10.1
9123SLC16A376.412.32.31.46.00.914.71.8
2548GAA75.610.611.34.99.08.013.113.9
22836RHOBTB374.518.725.311.722.48.211.910.7

Values expressed as mean RPKM.

RPKM values were calculated following alignment of fastq files from the Illumina BodyMap 2.0 project

QSOX1 encodes a protein belonging to the family of enzymes that catalyze disulfide bond formation and are important for cell growth [15] and was 3x higher than lung and almost 9x higher than adipose, breast, heart, kidney liver and smooth muscle (Table 2). Similar results were confirmed for QSOX1 expression using qRT-PCR, with the exception of placenta vs. lung expression (Figure 2A). These proteins have been shown to be protective against oxidative stress-induced cell death [16] suggesting that, in the complex redox state of placental development QSOX1 may be essential for trophoblast survival. Accordingly, expression of QSOX1 in the placenta was localized to the syncytium, as well as to the fetal endothelial cells (Figure 2B). Additionally, QSOX1 is a secreted enzyme that plays a role in extracellular matrix formation [17], consistent with the immunolabeling of QSOX1 in the villous stroma (Figure 2B). Another potential regulator of placental growth is IFI6, which appears to have an anti-apoptotic function in cancer [18, 19].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms545170f2.jpg
Genes novel to placental biology

Gene expression analysis via qRT-PCR of A)QSOX1, C)DLG5, and E)SEMA7A in placenta and 7 other tissues. Values are expressed as the fold change relative to placenta ± SD. Representative 40x images of term placenta from 3 subjects were immunostained with B) QSOX1, D) DLG5, and F) SEMA7A. Images (40x) of secondary-only negative controls for rabbit (left) and mouse (right) are depicted at the bottom of the figure.

DLG5 plays an important role in lung branching morphogenesis and progenitor differentiation [20] and is a regulator of apical polarity complexes [20] and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [21]. Cytotrophoblast fusion requires loss of cell-cell junctions [22], not dissimilar to EMT, suggesting that DLG5 may be important for the regulation syncytialization. Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that DLG5 was most highly expressed in placental tissue (Figure 2C) and was localized to the syncytium (Figure 2D). Similarly, semaphoring-7a, (SEMA7A) has also been implicated in regulating TGF-β induced EMT [23]. SEMA7A is a signaling molecule that is transcriptionally regulated by Ets2-receptor factor and HIF-1α and has been involved in the regulation of cell migration in the immune and nervous systems, as well as in cancer (recently reviewed, [24]). Corresponding with the RNA-seq results, qRT-PCR confirmed that SEMA7A was highly expressed in the placenta compared to the 7 other tissues (Figure 2E). Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis of SEMA7A indicated high expression in the placenta that was not cell-specific (Figure 2F), consistent with its role in a number of cell types.

Several developmentally regulated gene families have been shown to play a role in placental development and function. Hence, we mined our RNA-seq data to map the relative expression of key gene families within the placenta (Figure 3, Table S1). High-resolution images are provided in supplementary material. To date, 50 forkhead box (FOX) gene family members have been identified in humans [25] and of 45 FOX genes examined, we found FOXF1, FOXJ3, FOXK2, and FOXO4 were amongst the highest expressed FOX genes (Figure 3A, Table S1). Additionally, FOXO4 expression in the placenta was >3-fold higher when compared to other metabolic tissues (Table 2) suggesting it may have a specific role in placental physiology. FOXO proteins have been previously localized in placental tissue and fetal membranes [26] and transcriptionally regulate cell cycle progression, apoptosis, angiogenesis, inflammation, and anti-oxidant production [27], all of which are important pathways for placenta development and function. FOXO4 was localized to the syncytium and showed both nuclear and cytoplasmic expression (Figure 3D), consistent with its role as a transcriptional regulator. The SOX family of transcription factors regulate many developmental processes such as sex differentiation, neural development [28], cellular differentiation, [29] and blood vessel development [30]. SOX7, 13, 17 and 18, with known angiogenic and cardiovascular developmental functions, were among the highest expressed in placenta, consistent with the vascular nature of the placenta (Figure 3B, Table S1). Along with the many other roles of GATA-binding transcriptions factors in development, they have been identified as important for many reproductive developmental processes [31]. RNA-seq analysis showed that GATA2 and 3 were both highly and uniquely, enriched in placenta compared to other tissues (Table 2). GATA3 was localized to the cytoplasm of the syncytium, villous stroma, and showed nuclear and cytoplasmic staining in fetal endothelial cells (Figure 3E). We also identified high expression of the Hippo-kinase pathway, LATS1 and 2, and YAP1 and TEAD1 and 3 (Figure 3B, Table S2). This pathway has been recently shown to be critical in early trophectoderm lineage commitment [32]; however, it is yet to be characterized in term human placenta. Likewise, we also identified high expression of specific Wnt family members WNT2, 3a and 7a, FZD1 and the canonical effector β-catenin in the placenta (Figure 3C). Wnt2 expression is affected by pre-eclampsia [33] and WNT7A plays a critical role in uterine smooth muscle pattering and maintenance of adult uterine function [34]. However, its role in term placenta has been not been recognized. WNT7A showed strong immunolocalization to the cytoplasm and basal plasma membrane of the syncytium (Figure 3F), suggesting that WNT7A is produced in syncytiotrophoblast cells and may be released towards fetal circulation. Accordingly, WNT7A was also localized to the endothelium and showed some staining in villous stromal cells (possibly placental macrophages).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms545170f3.jpg
Developmentally regulated gene families in term placenta

Heat maps depicting the expression of A)FOX, B)SOX, GATA, and TEAD and C)WNT and FZD genes in placental tissue (n=20). Heat map colors red, white, and blue represent high, moderate, and low expression of transcripts, respectively. Details of average gene expression (RPKM) values are provided in supplementary table S1. High-resolution images are provided in supplementary material. Immunostaining of D) FoxO4, E) Gata3, and F) Wnt7a in human placenta. Representative images from 3 subjects were taken at 10x (top) and 40x (bottom) to show cell specific and intercellular localization. A 10x (left) and 40x (right) image of a secondary-only negative control is depicted on the bottom of the figure.

The present study has many strengths, including the use of deep sequencing technology to identify novel genes expressed in placental tissue and immunohistochemistry to identify cell specific localization. It also has some limitations. First, the wide range of BMI indicates that a heterogeneous population in regards to maternal adiposity was used; however we feel that this diversity provides a more translatable data set. Next, the cohort was composed mostly of male placenta, which could skew the expression of specific genes that show sex dependence, as previously reported [2]. Additionally, we did not perform our analysis on the various placental compartments (decidua, villous, chorion), which have previously been shown to have distinct gene expression signatures [2, 35]. Finally, because RNA-seq data for the 7 other tissues was obtained from the Illumina BodyMap 2.0 project, we were unable to confirm gene expression in the exact same samples, which may explain some of the discrepancies between the RNA-seq analysis and qRT-PCR results.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we present a genome-wide transcriptomic view of placental tissue and have identified novel genes highly expressed in term placenta that may be involved in both normal and pathogenic placental physiology. These findings may provide a starting point for future explorations of the potential roles for QSOX1, DLG5, SEMA7A, and other novel genes in placental development and disease. Additionally, taking advantage of the quantitative power of RNA-seq, we were able to identify the most abundant developmentally regulated gene family members within each sample, a comparison that is not possible with other gene expression methods. Overall, these findings provide a new reference for understanding of placental transcriptome and can aid in the identification of novel pathways regulating placenta physiology that may be dysregulated in placental disease.

Supplementary Material

01

Table S1:

Average RPKM values for select development genes in term human placenta

02

03

01

Table S1:

Average RPKM values for select development genes in term human placenta

Click here to view.(2.0M, tif)

02

Click here to view.(1.9M, tif)

03

Click here to view.(13K, docx)

Acknowledgments

These studies were supported in part by the USDA Agriculture Research Service CRIS 6251-51000-007-04S and National Institutes of Health-R01-DK084225 (K.S.). We gratefully acknowledge the members of the ACNC-Human Studies Core for their assistance in studies using human subjects. We also thank Dr. Curtis L. Lowrey, Jr. and members of the nursing staff at the UAMS Labor &amp; Delivery department for their assistance in sample collection. Nursing support for these studies was provided in part by the UAMS Translational Research Institute funded by the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, grants UL1TR000039 and KL2TR000063.

Arkansas Children’s Nutrition Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR USA
Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR USA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR USA
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Kartik Shankar, Ph.D., Arkansas Children’s Nutrition Center, 15 Children’s Way, Slot 512-20B, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA. Telephone: (501) 364-2847; Fax: (501) 364-3161; ude.smau@kitraKraknahS
Publisher's Disclaimer

Abstract

As the conduit for nutrients and growth signals, the placenta is critical to establishing an environment sufficient for fetal growth and development. To better understand the mechanisms regulating placental development and gene expression, we characterized the transcriptome of term placenta from 20 healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies using RNA-seq. To identify genes that were highly expressed and unique to the placenta we compared placental RNA-seq data to data from 7 other tissues (adipose, breast, hear, kidney, liver, lung, and smooth muscle) and identified several genes novel to placental biology (QSOX1, DLG5, and SEMA7A). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR confirmed the RNA-seq results and immunohistochemistry indicated these proteins were highly expressed in the placental syncytium. Additionally, we mined our RNA-seq data to map the relative expression of key developmental gene families (Fox, Sox, Gata, Tead, and Wnt) within the placenta. We identified FOXO4, GATA3, and WNT7A to be amongst the highest expressed members of these families. Overall, these findings provide a new reference for understanding of placental transcriptome and can aid in the identification of novel pathways regulating placenta physiology that may be dysregulated in placental disease.

Keywords: RNA-seq, development, gene expression, pregnancy, fetal tissue
Abstract

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Sitras V, Fenton C, Paulssen R, Vartun A, Acharya GDifferences in gene expression between first and third trimester human placenta: a microarray study. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33294.[Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sood R, Zehnder JL, Druzin ML, Brown POGene expression patterns in human placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(14):5478–83.[Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mikheev AM, Nabekura T, Kaddoumi A, Bammler TK, Govindarajan R, Hebert MF, Unadkat JDProfiling gene expression in human placentae of different gestational ages: an OPRU Network and UW SCOR Study. Reprod Sci. 2008;15(9):866–77.[Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sitras V, Paulssen RH, Gronaas H, Vartun A, Acharya GGene expression profile in labouring and non-labouring human placenta near term. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(1):61–5.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. Shankar K, Zhong Y, Kang P, Blackburn ML, Soares MJ, Badger TM, Gomez-Acevedo HRNA-seq analysis of the functional compartments within the rat placentation site. Endocrinology. 2012;153(4):1999–2011.[Google Scholar]
  • 6. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SLUltrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25.[Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hochberg Y, Benjamini YMore powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med. 1990;9(7):811–8.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MACircos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45.[Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fowden AL, Sibley C, Reik W, Constancia MImprinted genes, placental development and fetal growth. Horm Res. 2006;65 (Suppl 3):50–8.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. King JCMaternal obesity, metabolism, and pregnancy outcomes. Annu Rev Nutr. 2006;26:271–91.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Marzioni D, Quaranta A, Lorenzi T, Morroni M, Crescimanno C, De Nictolis M, Toti P, Muzzonigro G, Baldi A, De Luca A, Castellucci MExpression pattern alterations of the serine protease HtrA1 in normal human placental tissues and in gestational trophoblastic diseases. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24(10):1213–22.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sugulle M, Dechend R, Herse F, Weedon-Fekjaer MS, Johnsen GM, Brosnihan KB, Anton L, Luft FC, Wollert KC, Kempf T, Staff ACCirculating and placental growth-differentiation factor 15 in preeclampsia and in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus. Hypertension. 2009;54(1):106–12.[Google Scholar]
  • 13. Paiva P, Whitehead C, Saglam B, Palmer K, Tong SMeasurement of mRNA transcripts of very high placental expression in maternal blood as biomarkers of preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):E1807–15.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. Whitehead CL, Walker SP, Ye L, Mendis S, Kaitu'u-Lino TJ, Lappas M, Tong SPlacental specific mRNA in the maternal circulation are globally dysregulated in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):E429–36.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sevier CSErv2 and quiescin sulfhydryl oxidases: Erv-domain enzymes associated with the secretory pathway. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;16(8):800–8.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. Morel C, Adami P, Musard JF, Duval D, Radom J, Jouvenot MInvolvement of sulfhydryl oxidase QSOX1 in the protection of cells against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313(19):3971–82.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ilani T, Alon A, Grossman I, Horowitz B, Kartvelishvily E, Cohen SR, Fass DA secreted disulfide catalyst controls extracellular matrix composition and function. Science. 2013;341(6141):74–6.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cheriyath V, Glaser KB, Waring JF, Baz R, Hussein MA, Borden ECG1P3, an IFN-induced survival factor, antagonizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human myeloma cells. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(10):3107–17.[Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tahara E, Jr, Tahara H, Kanno M, Naka K, Takeda Y, Matsuzaki T, Yamazaki R, Ishihara H, Yasui W, Barrett JC, Ide T, Tahara EG1P3, an interferon inducible gene 6–16, is expressed in gastric cancers and inhibits mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in gastric cancer cell line TMK-1 cell. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005;54(8):729–40.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nechiporuk T, Klezovitch O, Nguyen L, Vasioukhin VDlg5 maintains apical aPKC and regulates progenitor differentiation during lung morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2013[Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sezaki T, Inada K, Sogabe T, Kakuda K, Tomiyama L, Matsuno Y, Ichikawa T, Matsuo M, Ueda K, Kioka NRole of Dlg5/lp-dlg, a membrane-associated guanylate kinase family protein, in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in LLc-PK1 renal epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35519.[Google Scholar]
  • 22. Getsios S, Chen GT, MacCalman CDRegulation of beta-catenin mRNA and protein levels in human villous cytotrophoblasts undergoing aggregation and fusion in vitro: correlation with E-cadherin expression. J Reprod Fertil. 2000;119(1):59–68.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. Allegra M, Zaragkoulias A, Vorgia E, Ioannou M, Litos G, Beug H, Mavrothalassitis GSemaphorin-7a reverses the ERF-induced inhibition of EMT in Ras-dependent mouse mammary epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23(19):3873–81.[Google Scholar]
  • 24. Jongbloets BC, Ramakers GM, Pasterkamp RJSemaphorin7A and its receptors: pleiotropic regulators of immune cell function, bone homeostasis, and neural development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013;24(3):129–38.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. Benayoun BA, Caburet S, Veitia RAForkhead transcription factors: key players in health and disease. Trends Genet. 2011;27(6):224–32.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lappas M, Lim R, Riley C, Menon R, Permezel MExpression and localisation of FoxO3 and FoxO4 in human placenta and fetal membranes. Placenta. 2010;31(12):1043–50.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. Huang H, Tindall DJDynamic FoxO transcription factors. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 15):2479–87.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rex M, Church R, Tointon K, Ichihashi RM, Mokhtar S, Uwanogho D, Sharpe PT, Scotting PJGranule cell development in the cerebellum is punctuated by changes in Sox gene expression. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1998;55(1):28–34.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kiefer JCBack to basics: Sox genes. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(8):2356–66.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 30. Downes M, Koopman PSOX18 and the transcriptional regulation of blood vessel development. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2001;11(8):318–24.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 31. LaVoie HAThe role of GATA in mammalian reproduction. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2003;228(11):1282–90.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nishioka N, Inoue K, Adachi K, Kiyonari H, Ota M, Ralston A, Yabuta N, Hirahara S, Stephenson RO, Ogonuki N, Makita R, Kurihara H, Morin-Kensicki EM, Nojima H, Rossant J, Nakao K, Niwa H, Sasaki HThe Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev Cell. 2009;16(3):398–410.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang Z, Zhang L, Jia L, Wang P, Gao YAssociation of Wnt2 and sFRP4 Expression in the Third Trimester Placenta in Women With Severe Preeclampsia. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(8):981–9.[Google Scholar]
  • 34. Miller C, Sassoon DAWnt-7a maintains appropriate uterine patterning during the development of the mouse female reproductive tract. Development. 1998;125(16):3201–11.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kim J, Zhao K, Jiang P, Lu ZX, Wang J, Murray JC, Xing YTranscriptome landscape of the human placenta. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:115.[Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.