Primary Small Intestinal Angiosarcoma: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment.
Journal: 2018/November - Journal of clinical medicine research
ISSN: 1918-3003
Abstract:
Angiosarcoma is an aggressive mesenchymal sarcoma of endothelial cell origin with high mortality. Its occurrence in the small intestine is exceedingly low. In addition to the rarity of small intestine angiosarcoma, the nonspecific early clinical symptoms obscure the suspicion of such tumors and thereby delay the diagnosis. In a hope to improve the knowledge of this rare but fatal neoplasm, we report one case of angiosarcoma of duodenum and jejunum in a 73-year-old man. Furthermore, we summarize and analyze the common clinical features, tumor markers, treatment, and survival of previous reported cases of this malignancy. Small bowel angiosarcoma occurs more often in men than women (1.6:1). The median age at diagnosis is 68.5 years. The overall median survival time is 150 days; the median survival time in female (300 days) is longer than that of male patients (120 days). Von Willebrand factor (vWF), CD31, CD34, vimentin, and Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 appear to be the most useful markers for the diagnosis. The majority of the patients underwent surgical resection alone or surgery with subsequent chemotherapy. The patients treated with surgery plus chemotherapy survive longer than those underwent surgical resection only (median 420 days, n = 7 vs. 96.5 days, n = 26, respectively; P = 0.0275). Further studies of more cases are needed for a better understanding of this rare entity, as well as the development of effective strategies for prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(3)
Drugs
(2)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. Mar/31/2018; 10(4): 294-301
Published online Feb/17/2018

Primary Small Intestinal Angiosarcoma: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment

+8 authors

Abstract

Introduction

Angiosarcomas are uncommon, aggressive mesenchymal sarcomas of endothelial cell origin with high mortality. It accounts for 1-2 % of soft tissue sarcoma. These tumors can arise from any location in the body due to the ubiquity of blood vessels and lymphatics, but most commonly found in skin and subcutaneous tissues [1]. There are cutaneous, visceral, and soft tissue subtypes of angiosarcomas, among which the visceral angiosarcomas comprise 15% to 47% of such neoplasms and are more difficult to diagnose than other subtypes [2-4]. Angiosarcomas have been reported in the breast, heart, lung, liver, spleen, adrenal glands, ovaries, and rarely in the gastrointestinal tract especially the small intestine, which have only been found in scattered case reports and small series [1, 5-45].

In addition to the rarity of the small intestine angiosarcoma, the nonspecific early clinical findings including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, anemia, fatigue, and weakness may further decrease the suspicion of such tumors and delay the diagnosis. The management of small intestine angiosarcomas would be improved by a better knowledge of such fatal neoplasms. We report a case of angiosracoma in the duodenum and jejunum in a 73-year-old man. In addition, the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and survival of small bowel angiosarcoma of previous reported cases are analyzed.

Literature Search and Cases

The previously reported cases before July 2016 of small intestine angiosarcoma were included in this study. The age, gender, symptoms on admission, anatomical locations, tumor markers used for diagnosis, subsequent therapies, and survival time of total of 47 cases are analyzed. There are two cases with indeterminate primary sites, one patient was found to have angiosarcoma in both skin and duodenum [5]; the other had operation on cardiac angiosarcoma 5 years before the diagnosis of the angiosarcoma in jejunum, and the authors thought the jejunal angiosarcoma as recurrent, however, a primary small bowel angiosarcoma is also possible after a 5-year interval since the diagnosis of the cardiac angiosarcoma [41]. The Wilcoxon two-sample test was used to compare the age distribution between male and female genders. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival times between different groups.

Case

A 73-year-old man presented with chest pain, dyspnea, melena, weakness, and fatigue for 3 days, and melena for 7 days since the discharge from a prior 3-month-long hospitalization for GI bleeding. No fever, chills, abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting was reported. During the previous hospitalization, patient had received multiple blood transfusions and undergone endoscopy and push enteroscopy that revealed Los Angeles Grade A erosive esophagitis, small sliding hiatal hernia, two erosions in the bulb, two cratered ulcers with adherent clots in D1 and D2, a fungating mass in D3. The biopsy of the mass showed acute-on-chronic inflammatory cells with granulation tissue. Patient had no prior radiation or polyvinyl exposure and no family history of GI malignancy. He was a former smoker. Vital signs were within normal limits on admission and physical exam showed a non-distended, non-tender abdomen with decreased bowel sounds and no organomegaly.

After admission, the patient received blood transfusions, and underwent multiple enteroscopy, with the biopsy from a bleeding ulcer in D3 revealed poorly differentiated high grade sarcoma. Subsequently, a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed; the pathology demonstrated multiple ulcerated mucosal and submucosal nodules up to 1cm in size of high grade angiosarcoma involving duodenum and jejunum, and metastatic angiosarcoma in 10 of 14 peripancreatic and mesenteric lymph nodes. The positivity for CD34, vimentin, Wilm’s tumor-1, and vWF supported the angiosarcoma diagnosis. Postoperative chest computed tomography (CT) showed masses in both lungs highly suspicious for metastasis that was absent 1 month prior. Patient survived 16 days after surgery on mechanical ventilation before family decided to discontinue treatment.

Literature Results

Age and gender distribution

There are 29 male and 18 female included in this study, the male to female ratio is 1.6:1. The ages of 18 female and 28 male patients are obtainable. The ages of female patients range from 25 to 85 years, with median value of 63.5 years; the ages of male patients range from 25 to 87 years, with median of 69.5 years (Fig. 1, Table 1). There was no significant difference in the age distributions between the two genders (n = 28 female vs. 18 male; P = 0.772, Wilcoxon two-sample test).

Figure 1
Age distribution in male and female patients of small intestinal angiosarcoma. There is no significant difference in age distribution between male and female genders (P = 0.677, Wilcoxon two-sample test, n = 28 and 18, respectively; the age of one male patient is missing).
Table 1
Age and Gender Characteristics of Patients With Small Intestinal Angiosarcoma
GenderRange of age (years)Median age (years)Mean age (years)n
Female25 - 8563.562.418
Male25 - 8769.564.729

The presenting clinical characteristics

The clinical symptoms and signs on initial presentation are nonspecific. The common clinical features (in descending order of frequency) include abdominal pain, anemia, GI bleeding, fatigue/weakness, weight loss, dyspnea, abdominal distension/bowel obstruction, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, acute abdomen, and bowel perforation (Table 2).

Table 2
Symptoms and Signs in Patients With Small Intestine Angiosarcoma
SymptomNumber of casesPercentage (%)
Abd pain1941.3
Anemia1634.8
GI bleed1226.1
Fatigue/weakness919.6
Weight loss817.4
Dyspnea817.4
Abd distension/bowel obstruction613.0
Anorexia510.9
Nausea/vomiting48.7
Acute abdomen48.7
Perforation48.7
Diarrhea24.3
Chest pain12.2
Abd: abdominal; GI: gastrointestinal.

Risk factors

The development of angiosarcoma has been related to history of radiation exposure, certain environmental toxins or foreign bodies, chronic lymphedema, and genetic factors [3, 4]. There are 17 patients who had previous radiation exposure, among which 16 with therapeutic radiation, one with a 30-year-long exposure to both occupational radiation and polyvinyl chloride. The onset of radiation exposure is available in14 cases, ranging from 3 to 30 years prior to the diagnosis of angiosarcoma, with median latency of 9.5 years. In addition, there was one case with hemodialysis for 21 years (Table 3). Therefore, based on the current data, previous heavy radioactive exposure is likely the most common preventable environmental risk factor for small intestinal angiosarcoma.

Table 3
Risk Factor for Small Intestinal Angiosarcoma in Reported Cases
Risk factorNumber of casesPercentage (%)
Hemodialysis12.2
Radiation only1635.6
Radiation/Polyvinyl12.2
Unspecified2760.0
Total45100.0

Anatomical distribution and stages of small intestinal angiosarcoma

The location of the angiosarcoma in small bowel as reported were (percentage of the 47 cases, in descending order): ileum only (29.8%), jejunum only (27.7%), unspecified small intestine (23.4%), duodenum/jejunum (10.6%), duodenum only (4.3%), jejunum/ileum (2.1%) and duodenum/jejunum/ileum (2.1%) (Table 4). The jejunum and ileum are the most common locations for small intestinal angiosarcoma.

Table 4
Location of Small Intestinal Angiosarcoma
LocationPercentage (%)
Duodenum4.3
Duodenum/Jejunum10.6
Duodenum/Jejunum/Ileum2.1
Jejunum27.7
Ileum29.8
Jejunum/Ileum2.1
Unspecified small intestine23.4
Total100.0

Among the 47 patients reported, 26 had metastatic disease, three patients with stage III, and four patients with stage II, others indeterminate. The metastatic sites include liver (11/26, 42.3%), lung (11/26, 42.3%), peritoneum (5/26, 19.2%), spleen (4/26, 15.4%), bone (3/26, 11.5%), stomach (3/26, 11.5%), mesentery (3/26, 11.5%), two cases of kidney (2/26, 7.7%), abdominal wall (2/26, 7.7%) and retroperitoneal (2/26, 7.7%); and one case for each of these sites: brain, oropharynx, thoracic cavity, pleura, pancreas, omentum, gall bladder, urinary bladder, appendix and skin (1/26, 3.8%).

Biomarkers for diagnosis

The diagnosis of small bowel angiosarcoma may be very challenging due to the non-specific clinical, radiological and histopathological features as seen in our and previously reported cases [1, 5-45]. Imaging studies including CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) scan, and ultrasound can be used to define the extent of abdominal angiosarcoma prior to operation. Endoscopy and enteroscopy help detect the source of bleeding. Although the biopsy done by endoscopy and/or enteroscopy may lead to the appropriate diagnosis, it may be overlooked initially as in our case. Surgical resection and subsequent immunohistochemical studies are therefore required for a definitive diagnosis [3, 4].

Histological characteristics of angiosarcoma may provide useful clues for diagnosis. Angiosarcoma can be classified into different subtypes based on the cytologic appearance: spindle-shaped endothelial cells, epithelioid with large rounded or polygonal cells, and pleomorphic or mixed phenotypes as in most angiosarcoma [21]. Areas of irregular anastomosing vasculature lined by atypical endothelial cells are readily identifiable in histology study. However, the existence of anaplasia in most of angiosarcomas makes it challenging to distinguish such tumors from other undifferentiated ones such as melanoma or carcinoma. Therefore immunohistochemistry is mandatory to establish the definitive diagnosis of angiosarcoma. Expression of endothelial markers CD31, CD34, von Willebrand factor (vWF), Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (UEA-1), Friend leukemia integration 1 (Fli-1), endothelin-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR), and erythroblast transformation specific related gene (ERG) can help identify angiosarcomas, each with different sensitivity and specificity (Table 5, [2, 46-51]), among which the vWF, UEA-1 and CD31 are considered the most useful for the diagnosis of poorly differentiated cases [1].

Table 5
Sensitivity and Specificity of Some Markers for Angiosarcoma Diagnosis [2, 46-51]
MarkerSensitivitySpecificity
CD3177-100%High
CD3440-100%Low
vWF50-84%High
UEA-170-87%Low
Fli-194%high
ERG100%high
ERG: erythroblast transformation specific related gene; UEA-1: Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1.

However, some of these markers may be lost due to progressive tumor dedifferentiation. Otherwise, epithelioid angiosarcoma may express cytokeratins, which makes it difficult to distinguish it from poorly differentiated carcinomas. Therefore, a number of other markers with different tissue specificity including lymphatic endothelial (lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1/Lyve-1 or podoplanin/D2-40), smooth muscle (desmin), neural (S100, SOX10), epithelial (keratin), stromal (CD117, DOG1), melanocytic (HMB-45, melan-A), human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8), and mesothelial (calretinin, CK5/6, HBME-1 and WT-1) can be used to distinguish angiosarcoma from other tumors such melanoma [3, 26, 48].

The markers used in the reported cases of small intestinal angiosarcoma are summarized in Table 6. Among which, collagen IV, a marker for basal lamina collagen has proven to be a powerful tool in the identification of endothelial neoplasm in combination with other markers [52]. Overexpression of vimentin, a marker for epithelial-mesenchymal transition, is linked to accelerated tumor growth, tissue invasion, and poor outcome [53].

Table 6
Markers Used for Immunohistochemical Studies in Reported Cases
MarkersNumber of positive casesPercentage (%)
vWF2655.3
CD312553.2
CD341736.2
Vimentin1327.7
UEA-1612.8
Keratin48.5
Collagen IV24.3
Anti-endothelin-112.1
WT-112.1
ERG12.1
UEA-1: Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1; ERG: erythroblast transformation specific related gene.

The expression of those endothelial markers is heterogeneous in different types of vessels of various organs [49, 54]. Also, unusual expression patterns and loss of endothelial markers are common findings in angiosarcomas [55]. Therefore, a combination of multiple markers may markedly improve the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis in challenging angiosarcoma cases (Table 7, [2, 50, 56-58]).

Table 7

Markers Useful for Angiosarcoma Differentiation [2, 50, 56-58]

TumorsPositive stainNegative stainVariable stain
AngiosarcomaCD31, vWF, Fli-1, vimentinS-100, EMA, SMA, HHV-8 LNA-1CD34, CK, D2-40, Bcl-2
Kapasi sarcomaHHV-8 LNA-1, D2-40S-100, EMA, SMA, Bcl-2
CarcinomaCK, EMA, mucinCD31, CD34, vWF, Fli-1
MelanomaS-100, HMB-45, melan-A, vimentinCD31, CD34, vWF, FLI-1
Malignant mesotheliomaCalretinin, WT-1, CK5/6, HBME-1, vimentinCD31, CD34, vWF, Fli-1
Epithelioid sarcomaCK, EMA, vimentinvWF, Fli-1, S-100CD31, CD34
HemangioendotheliomaCD31, CD34, vWF, Fli-1EMACK, SMA
Anaplastic large cell lymphomaCD30, CD45, pan–T-cell markerCD31, CD34, vWF, Fli-1
CK: cytokeratin; HBME-1: Hector Battifora mesothelial-1; HHV-8 LNA-1: human herpesvirus type 8 latent nuclear antigen-1; EMA: epithelial membrane antigen; Fli-1: Friend leukemia integration 1; SMA: smooth muscle actin; WT-1, Wilms tumor-1.

Treatment and outcome

The treatment modalities are available in 45 patients with small intestinal angiosarcoma (Table 8), among which 31 patients underwent resection alone (26 cases with obtainable survival times); eight had resection/chemotherapy (seven with survival times); two with surgery/chemotherapy/radiation therapy (both with survival times reported); one patient received surgery, but it is unclear if other treatment modality was added subsequently (with survival time); one patient received chemotherapy only (with survival time); one had chemotherapy/radiation (with survival time), and one patient treated was Argon plasma coagulation (APC, with survival time), the treatment for two patients are unavailable (with survival time). The chemotherapy agents used as single or in combination are anthracycline (three cases), paclitaxel (three cases), dacarbazine (two cases), cisplatin (one case), thalidomide (one case), vincristine (one case), and cyclophosphamide (one case).

Table 8
Therapeutic Modalities in Reported Cases
Therapeutic modalitiesNumber of casesPercentage (%)
Surg3166.0
Surg/Chemo817.0
Surg/Chemo/Rad24.3
Surg/NA12.1
Chemo12.1
Chemo/Rad12.1
APC12.1
Unspecified24.3
Total47100.0
Surg: surgery; Chemo: chemotherapy; Rad: radiation therapy; APC: argon plasma coagulation. NA: the other modality not available.

Among the 26 patients treated with surgery alone and included for survival analysis, 16 had metastatic disease at diagnosis, two with stage III, while the stages of the other eight patients indeterminate. Six out of the seven patients treated with surgery plus chemotherapy were found to have metastatic lesions at diagnosis, while the other one was indeterminate. Furthermore, almost all of the patients with metastatic small bowel angiosarcoma underwent surgical resection with or without additional treatment modalities: surgery alone (18/26, 69.2%), surgery plus chemotherapy (6/26, 23.1%), surgery plus chemotherapy and radiation (1/26, 3.8%), and only one patient was treated with APC (1/26, 3.8%).

The median survival times are obtainable for 41 patients (as reported or from personal communications). The median survival time is 150 days (range 9 to more than 3,720 days) days after diagnosis (Fig. 2a). The median survival times are 300 days for female (n = 15) and 120 days for male patients (n = 26), with no significant difference between the genders (log-rank test: z = 0.17; P = 0.86; Fig. 2b). The overall 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5- year survival rates are 36.6%, 14.6%, 12.2%, and 2.4% respectively. The survival rates are markedly lower than that of the primary soft-tissue sarcomas (5-year survival of 50-60%), and overall angiosarcomas (5-year survival of about 35%) [1].

Figure 2
(a) Survival analysis of patients with small intestinal angiosarcoma. (b) There is no gender difference in the survival times between male and female patients (0 = female, 1 = male; Log-rank test, z = 0.17, P = 0.86, n = 15 and 26, respectively).

The survival times in different treatment groups are further summarized (median survival time) as showed in Figure 3. There is a significant difference in the survival times between patients treated with surgical resection only (range 8 - 3,720 days; median 96.5 days, n = 26) compared with surgery/chemotherapy (range 150 - 1,080 days, median 420 days, n = 7; log-rank test, z = 2.2; P = 0.0275). Due to the small number of cases for other treatment modalities, only range and median survival times are provided here: surgery/chemotherapy/radiation (range 1,020 - 1,440 days, median 1,230 days, n = 2); upfront surgery but with unknown subsequent therapy (1,080 days, n = 1); chemotherapy only (median 120 days, n = 1); chemotherapy/radiation (540 days, n = 1), APC (42 days, n = 1); unspecified treatment (range 120 - 510, median 315 days, n = 2).

Figure 3
Survival times in different treatment groups. The survival time is longer in patients received resection/chemotherapy compared to that in patients underwent surgery alone (*P = 0.0275; Log-rank test; n = 7 and 26, respectively). The survival times in other treatment groups are not compared due to the limited case numbers. *Compared to treatment with patients treated with surgery only. APC: argon plasma coagulation; Chemo: chemotherapy; NA: the other modality not available; Rad: radiation therapy; Surg: surgery.

Discussion

The incidence, risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and survival time of total of 47 cases of small bowel angiosarcoma reported in English literature are analyzed (including our case). Most of the patients demonstrated nonspecific GI symptoms upon initial presentation and at advanced cancer stages, which might contribute to the late diagnosis and resultant short survival time. The prompt diagnosis not only requires high index of vigilance, but the use of markers such as vWF, UEA-1, and CD31 [1]. The ages at diagnosis range from 25 - 87 years, with median of 68.5 years. Prior radiation exposure was reported in 36% of cases included, with a median latency of 9.5 years, suggesting a causal role of radiation in the carcinogenesis of small bowel angiosarcoma. The overall median survival time is 150 days. Although there is no significant difference in the survival time between the two genders, the median survival time in female seems to be longer than that of male patients (300 vs. 120 days, respectively; P = 0.86). The lack of statistical significance might be related to the small number of cases included.

Due to the rarity of the small intestinal angiosarcoma there remains a lack of randomized clinical trials and recommendations for the treatment. Generally the management includes initial control of anemia and bleeding followed by resection and/or chemotherapy. Surgery is the first line modality for localized resectable tumors, which may also be used for palliative relief in patients with metastatic disease. For localized angiosarcoma, complete radical resection (R0) with wide margins is the primary treatment of choice. However, involved margins (R1 or R2 resection) are common due to diffuse tissue infiltration, and often multifocal characteristics of angiosarcoma, which leads to a worse prognosis, therefore adjuvant radiation therapy may be employed. Radiation therapy alone is largely inadequate, and further radiotherapy is usually avoided for radiation-induced angiosarcomas. The role of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for angiosarcoma is unclear [1]. The adjuvant therapy regimens are generally empiric and based on the protocols for cutaneous angiosarcoma [17, 21, 31]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered in patients with adequate functional status, while adjuvant chemotherapy can be continued in patients responding to initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Although the evidence is limited, the metastatic angiosarcoma is primarily treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The drugs used for the treatment of angiosarcoma include paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, sorafenib, sunitinib, and bevacizumab [59-65]. The recommended treatment for unresectable or stage IV intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma is to downstage the tumor first with combination chemotherapy, chemoradiation or radiation therapy, followed by subsequent treatment based on the resectability. If the tumor is resectable based on the imaging assessment, treatment with surgery, or preoperative radiation or chemotherapy then surgery may be used; if unresectable, palliative treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery for symptomatic control, supportive care can be considered, or observation in asymptomatic patients [65]. However, as described above, the vast majority of the patients with metastatic small bowel angiosarcoma underwent surgical resection with or without additional treatment modalities (25/26, 96.2%).

The addition of chemotherapy to surgery appears to have a survival benefit. The survival time in patients received surgery plus chemotherapy is longer than that in ones underwent surgery only (420 days, n = 7 vs. 96.5 days, n = 26, respectively; P = 0.0019). Although the survival may be affected by the disease stages at diagnosis, it is less likely to explain the difference described above, since a higher percentage of cases received surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy was metastatic (6 out of 7, 85.7%), in contrast to that treated with surgery only (16 out of 26, 61.5%). However, due to the small sample size, the difference in the survival times between those treatment groups may not reflect the true effects of the specific treatment modalities. Further studies are required to determine the optimal treatment strategy for this rare disease entity.

The information provided in this study would help the physicians, especially gastroenterologists, to better understand clinical feature and management of small intestine angiosarcoma and maintain a high level of vigilance, which is essential for the early recognition of this rare but fatal disease. Further studies are needed for the development of better approaches for prevention, early diagnosis, and effective therapy.

References

  • 1. YoungRJBrownNJReedMWHughesDWollPJAngiosarcomaLancet Oncol20101110983991[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. HartJMandavilliSEpithelioid angiosarcoma: a brief diagnostic review and differential diagnosisArch Pathol Lab Med20111352268272[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. JuanCJYuCYHsuHHChianCPHuangGSFanHCChenCYVisceral and nonvisceral angiosarcomas: Imaging features and clinical correlationChinese J Rad2000255183189[Google Scholar]
  • 4. LucasDRAngiosarcoma, radiation-associated angiosarcoma, and atypical vascular lesionArch Pathol Lab Med20091331118041809[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. Al AliJKoHHOwenDSteinbrecherUPEpithelioid angiosarcoma of the small bowelGastrointest Endosc200664610181021[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. Al-DarajiWHusainEZelgerBGZelgerBA practical and comprehensive immunohistochemical approach to the diagnosis of superficial soft tissue tumorsInt J Clin Exp Pathol200922119131[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. AllisonKHYoderBJBronnerMPGoldblumJRRubinBPAngiosarcoma involving the gastrointestinal tract: a series of primary and metastatic casesAm J Surg Pathol2004283298307[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. AitolaPPoutiainenANordbackISmall-bowel angiosarcoma after pelvic irradiation: a report of two casesInt J Colorectal Dis1999146308310[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. BerryGJAndersonCJPittsWCNeitzelGFWeissLMCytology of angiosarcoma in effusionsActa Cytol1991355538542[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Butron VilaTGarcia VillarOAlonso GarciaSBonachia NaranjoOPerez EspejoGLomas EspadasMHidalgo PascualMAngiosarcoma in the small intestine. Apropos of a particular caseHepatogastroenterology2005526411391142[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. ChamiTNRatnerLEHenneberryJSmithDPHillGKatzPOAngiosarcoma of the small intestine: a case report and literature reviewAm J Gastroenterol1994895797800[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. ChenJLMokKTTsengHHWangBWLiuSIChenCWDuodenal angiosarcoma: an unusual cause of severe gastrointestinal bleedingJ Chin Med Assoc2007708352355[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. ChenKTHoffmanKDHendricksEJAngiosarcoma following therapeutic irradiationCancer197944620442048[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. CilursuAMMassive hemorrhage due to angiosarcomatosis diagnosed by intraoperative small bowel endoscopyEndoscopy1991234245[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 15. de Mascarenhas-SaraivaMNda Silva Araujo LopesLMSmall-bowel tumors diagnosed by wireless capsule endoscopy: report of five casesEndoscopy20033510865868[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. DelvauxVSciotRNeuvilleBMoermanPPeetersMFilezLVan BeckevoortDet alMultifocal epithelioid angiosarcoma of the small intestineVirchows Arch200043719094[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zacarias FohrdingLMacherABraunsteinSKnoefelWTToppSASmall intestine bleeding due to multifocal angiosarcomaWorld J Gastroenterol2012184464946500[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. FraimanGGantiAKPottiAMehdiSAngiosarcoma of the small intestine: a possible role for thalidomide?Med Oncol2003204397402[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. GrewalJSDanielARCarsonEJCatanzaroATShehabTMTworekJARapidly progressive metastatic multicentric epithelioid angiosarcoma of the small bowel: a case report and a review of literatureInt J Colorectal Dis2008238745756[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. HansenSHHolckSFlygerHTangeUBRadiation-associated angiosarcoma of the small bowel. A case of multiploidy and a fulminant clinical course. Case reportAPMIS199610412891894[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. HuntingtonJTJonesCLiebnerDAChenJLPollockREAngiosarcoma: A rare malignancy with protean clinical presentationsJ Surg Oncol20151118941950[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 22. HwangTLSunCFChenMFAngiosarcoma of the small intestine after radiation therapy: report of a caseJ Formos Med Assoc1993927658661[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. KhalilMFThomasAAassadARubinMTaubRNEpithelioid angiosarcoma of the small intestine after occupational exposure to radiation and polyvinyl chloride: a case report and review of literatureSarcoma200593-4161164[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 24. KelemenKYuQQHowardLSmall intestinal angiosarcoma leading to perforation and acute abdomen: a case report and review of the literatureArch Pathol Lab Med200412819598[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. KnopFKHansenMBMeisnerSSmall-bowel hemangiosarcoma and capsule endoscopyEndoscopy2003357637[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. LiuDSSmithHLeeMMDjericMSmall intestinal angiosarcoma masquerading as an appendiceal abscessAnn R Coll Surg Engl2013951e2224[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. MohammedAAliyuHOLimanAAAbdullahiKAbubakarNAngiosarcoma of the small intestineAnn Afr Med2011103246248[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 28. MaeyashikiCNagataNUemuraNAngiosarcoma involving solid organs and the gastrointestinal tract with life-threatening bleedingCase Rep Gastroenterol201263772777[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 29. NanusDMKelsenDClarkDGRadiation-induced angiosarcomaCancer1987604777779[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 30. Navarro-ChagoyaDFigueroa-RuizMLopez-GomezJNava-LeyvaHAlvarez-PonceCEGuzman-SombreroGVelazquez-GarciaJObscure gastrointestinal bleeding due to multifocal intestinal angiosarcomaInt J Surg Case Rep201510169172[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 31. NiQShangDPengHRoyMLiangGBiWGaoXPrimary angiosarcoma of the small intestine with metastasis to the liver: a case report and review of the literatureWorld J Surg Oncol201311242[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 32. OgawaSMinowaOOzakiYKuwatsuruRSumiYMaeharaTSmall bowel intussusception caused by intestinal angiosarcomatosis: usefulness of MR enteroclysis with infusion of water through a nasojejunal catheterEur Radiol2002123534536[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 33. OrdonezNGdel JuncoGWAyalaAGAhmedNAngiosarcoma of the small intestine: an immunoperoxidase studyAm J Gastroenterol1983784218221[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 34. Policarpio-NicolasMLNicolasMMKehPLaskinWBPostradiation angiosarcoma of the small intestine: a case report and review of literatureAnn Diagn Pathol2006105301305[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 35. SelkAWehrliBTaylorBMChylous ascites secondary to small-bowel angiosarcomaCan J Surg2004475383384[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 36. SideritsRPobleteFSaraiyaBRimmerCHazraAAyeLAngiosarcoma of small bowel presenting with obstruction: novel observations on a rare diagnostic entity with unique clinical presentationCase Rep Gastrointest Med20122012480135[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 37. SuCCJinYTChienCHYuCYLinPWPostirradiation angiosarcoma of the terminal ileumZhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)1991482147152[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 38. SuzukiFSaitoAIshiKKoyatsuJMaruyamaTSudaKIntra-abdominal angiosarcomatosis after radiotherapyJ Gastroenterol Hepatol1999143289292[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 39. TakahashiMOharaMKimuraNDomenHYamabukiTKomuroKTsuchikawaTet alGiant primary angiosarcoma of the small intestine showing severe sepsisWorld J Gastroenterol201420431635916363[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 40. TaxyJBBattiforaHAngiosarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. A report of three casesCancer1988621210216[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 41. TuranMKaradayiKDumanMOzerHAriciSYildirirCKocakOet alSmall bowel tumors in emergency surgeryUlus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg2010164327333[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 42. UsudaHNaitoMMulticentric angiosarcoma of the gastrointestinal tractPathol Int1997478553556[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 43. WatanabeKHoshiNSuzukiTSuzukiTEpithelioid angiosarcoma of the intestinal tract with endothelin-1-like immunoreactivityVirchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol19934234309314[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 44. WolovRBSatoNAzumiNLackEEIntra-abdominal "angiosarcomatosis" report of two cases after pelvic irradiationCancer199167922752279[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 45. ZemheriaEEnginaPOzkanliaSOzemirIAPrimary angiosarcoma of small intestine presenting with intestinal perforation: a case reportJ Med Cases201452113115[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 46. Fanburg-SmithJCFurlongMAChildersELOral and salivary gland angiosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 29 casesMod Pathol2003163263271[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 47. FolpeALChandEMGoldblumJRWeissSWExpression of Fli-1, a nuclear transcription factor, distinguishes vascular neoplasms from potential mimicsAm J Surg Pathol200125810611066[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 48. MiettinenMLindenmayerAEChaubalAEndothelial cell markers CD31, CD34, and BNH9 antibody to H- and Y-antigens - evaluation of their specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of vascular tumors and comparison with von Willebrand factorMod Pathol1994718290[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 49. OhsawaMNakaNTomitaYKawamoriDKannoHAozasaKUse of immunohistochemical procedures in diagnosing angiosarcoma. Evaluation of 98 casesCancer1995751228672874[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 50. PobletEGonzalez-PalaciosFJimenezFJDifferent immunoreactivity of endothelial markers in well and poorly differentiated areas of angiosarcomasVirchows Arch19964284-5217221[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 51. SullivanHCEdgarMACohenCKovachCKHooKimKReidMDThe utility of ERG, CD31 and CD34 in the cytological diagnosis of angiosarcoma: an analysis of 25 casesJ Clin Pathol20156814450[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 52. SchmidtDvon HochstetterARThe use of CD31 and collagen IV as vascular markers. A study of 56 vascular lesionsPathol Res Pract19951915410414[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 53. SatelliALiSVimentin in cancer and its potential as a molecular target for cancer therapyCell Mol Life Sci2011681830333046[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 54. PusztaszeriMPSeelentagWBosmanFTImmunohistochemical expression of endothelial markers CD31, CD34, von Willebrand factor, and Fli-1 in normal human tissuesJ Histochem Cytochem2006544385395[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 55. RaoPLahatGArnoldCGavinoACLahatSHornickJLLevDet alAngiosarcoma: a tissue microarray study with diagnostic implicationsAm J Dermatopathol2013354432437[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 56. GillRO’DonnellRJHorvaiAUtility of immunohistochemistry for endothelial markers in distinguishing epithelioid hemangioendothelioma from carcinoma metastatic to boneArch Pathol Lab Med20091336967972[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 57. KahnHJBaileyDMarksAMonoclonal antibody D2-40, a new marker of lymphatic endothelium, reacts with Kaposi’s sarcoma and a subset of angiosarcomasMod Pathol2002154434440[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 58. LeeKBLeeHSLeeHEParkSYChungJHChoeGKimWHSongKYImmunohistochemical characteristics of Kaposi sarcoma and its mimicriesKorean J Pathol200640361367[Google Scholar]
  • 59. PenelNBuiBNBayJOCupissolDRay-CoquardIPiperno-NeumannSKerbratPet alPhase II trial of weekly paclitaxel for unresectable angiosarcoma: the ANGIOTAX StudyJ Clin Oncol2008263252695274[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 60. SchlemmerMReichardtPVerweijJHartmannJTJudsonIThyssAHogendoornPCet alPaclitaxel in patients with advanced angiosarcomas of soft tissue: a retrospective study of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma groupEur J Cancer2008441624332436[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 61. MakiRGD’AdamoDRKeohanMLSaulleMSchuetzeSMUndeviaSDLivingstonMBet alPhase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomasJ Clin Oncol2009271931333140[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 62. GeorgeSMerriamPMakiRGVan den AbbeeleADYapJTAkhurstTHarmonDCet alMulticenter phase II trial of sunitinib in the treatment of nongastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcomasJ Clin Oncol2009271931543160[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 63. AgulnikMYarberJLOkunoSHvon MehrenMJovanovicBDBrocksteinBEEvensAMet alAn open-label, multicenter, phase II study of bevacizumab for the treatment of angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomasAnn Oncol2013241257263[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 64. NaganoTYamadaYIkedaTKankiHKamoTNishigoriCDocetaxel: a therapeutic option in the treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma: report of 9 patientsCancer20071103648651[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.