The modifying potential of diacylglycerol (DAG) oil on tumor development was investigated in a medium-term multi-organ carcinogenesis bioassay. DAG oil is a cooking oil that contains >80% diglycerides, <20% triglycerides and <5% monoglycerides. Male 6-week-old F344 rats (20 in each group) were sequentially treated with five carcinogens for initiation in different organ target sites for 4 weeks (DMBDD treatment), and then administered DAG oil at dietary levels of 0% (control), 1.375%, 2.75% or 5.5% [triacylglycerol (TGs), with the same fatty acid composition as DAG oil were also added at dietary levels of 5.5%, 4.125%, 2.75% and 0%, respectively, to maintain the same lipid level], or 5.5% high linoleic acid TG (HLTG), 5.5% high oleic acid TG (HOTG), or 5.5% medium-chain TG (MCTG) (as reference substances, mostly consisting of triacylglycerols) admixed into AIN-93G semi-synthetic diet, for an additional 24 weeks. Controls received standard diet without any supplementation as non-treated control. All animals were killed at the end of week 28, and the major organs were carefully examined for preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions. No DAG oil treatment-related changes were noted in survival, general conditions, body weights, food consumption and organ weights. Upon quantitative analysis of glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P) positive foci of the liver, DAG oil was not found to exert any effects. The incidence of colon adenomas was significantly increased in rats given 1.375% DAG oil, but not 2.75% and 5.5% DAG oil, when compared to the control (5.5% TG group) value. Furthermore, incidences and multiplicity of hyperplasias and adenomas and/or adenocarcinomas were comparable across all DAG oil-treated groups. In contrast, incidences of colon adenomas and/or adenocarcinomas were significantly increased in rats given 5.5% HOTG, and adenomas with MCTG, but not 5.5% HLTG, as compared to the 5.5% TG value. Preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions induced by DMBDD treatment in various organs other than the large intestine were comparable in all cases. Thus, the current results indicate that DAG oil may not exert modifying potential on tumor development, even in the colon because of the lack of dose-dependence. DAG oil was equivalent to HOTG (standard cocking oil composed of naturally occurring fatty acids), with regard to colon tumor development. Further dose-response study concerning HOTG may be needed to confirm whether the enhancing effect of large intestine carcinogenesis exert or not.