Effect of starter culture and turmeric on physico-chemical quality of carabeef pastirma.
Journal: 2013/April - Journal of Food Science and Technology
ISSN: 0022-1155
Abstract:
Carabeef samples were sliced, pressed, cured and divided into 6 groups. Starter cultures (Micrococcus varians M483 (MV), Staphylococcus carnosus (SC), Lactobacillus sakei (LS), M. varians M483+ Lb. sakei and Staph. carnosus + Lb. sakei) were inoculated at the dose of 10(6)-0(7)cfu/g and stored at 10 ± 1°C for 7 days. Uninoculated samples were maintained as control. Samples were then divided into 2 treatment groups. Samples of treatment 1 (T1) were smeared with a paste of turmeric followed by application of a thick layer of the paste of garlic, cumin, black pepper and red pepper whereas, samples of treatment 2 (T2) were applied with a thick layer of spices as above without turmeric. With the gradual fall in pH there was a reduction in water-holding capacity (WHC) of samples. The WHC of samples treated with SC+LS of T1 reduced to 6.3 ± 0.03 cm(2) and those inoculated with MV+LS of T2 to 6.2 ± 0.03 cm(2). The extract release volume (ERV) increased in all samples during storage. The least ERV of 11.7 and 11.6 ml were recorded in samples inoculated with MV of T1 and T2, respectively. The tyrosine (TV) and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) number of turmeric treated samples were significantly lower than non turmeric treated samples. The samples inoculated with LS had the least TV of 30.9 mg tyrosine/100 g of meat and TBA number of 0.06 mg manoladehyde/kg of meat. Samples inoculated with MV and LS of both T1 and T2 were better in physico-chemical qualities.
Relations:
Content
References
(3)
Drugs
(6)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
J Food Sci Technol 47(1): 89-93

Effect of starter culture and turmeric on physico-chemical quality of carabeef <em>pastirma</em>

Abstract

Carabeef samples were sliced, pressed, cured and divided into 6 groups. Starter cultures (Micrococcus varians M483 (MV), Staphylococcus carnosus (SC), Lactobacillus sakei (LS), M. varians M483+ Lb. sakei and Staph. carnosus + Lb. sakei) were inoculated at the dose of 10–0cfu/g and stored at 10 ± 1°C for 7 days. Uninoculated samples were maintained as control. Samples were then divided into 2 treatment groups. Samples of treatment 1 (T1) were smeared with a paste of turmeric followed by application of a thick layer of the paste of garlic, cumin, black pepper and red pepper whereas, samples of treatment 2 (T2) were applied with a thick layer of spices as above without turmeric. With the gradual fall in pH there was a reduction in water-holding capacity (WHC) of samples. The WHC of samples treated with SC+LS of T1 reduced to 6.3 ± 0.03 cm and those inoculated with MV+LS of T2 to 6.2 ± 0.03 cm. The extract release volume (ERV) increased in all samples during storage. The least ERV of 11.7 and 11.6 ml were recorded in samples inoculated with MV of T1 and T2, respectively. The tyrosine (TV) and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) number of turmeric treated samples were significantly lower than non turmeric treated samples. The samples inoculated with LS had the least TV of 30.9 mg tyrosine/100 g of meat and TBA number of 0.06 mg manoladehyde/kg of meat. Samples inoculated with MV and LS of both T1 and T2 were better in physico-chemical qualities.

Keywords: Carabeef, Pastirma, Micrococcus varians, Lactobacillus sakei, Staphylococcus carnosus, Physicochemical quality, Turmeric

Abstract

Carabeef samples were sliced, pressed, cured and divided into 6 groups. Starter cultures (Micrococcus varians M483 (MV), Staphylococcus carnosus (SC), Lactobacillus sakei (LS), M. varians M483+ Lb. sakei and Staph. carnosus + Lb. sakei) were inoculated at the dose of 10–0cfu/g and stored at 10 ± 1°C for 7 days. Uninoculated samples were maintained as control. Samples were then divided into 2 treatment groups. Samples of treatment 1 (T1) were smeared with a paste of turmeric followed by application of a thick layer of the paste of garlic, cumin, black pepper and red pepper whereas, samples of treatment 2 (T2) were applied with a thick layer of spices as above without turmeric. With the gradual fall in pH there was a reduction in water-holding capacity (WHC) of samples. The WHC of samples treated with SC+LS of T1 reduced to 6.3 ± 0.03 cm and those inoculated with MV+LS of T2 to 6.2 ± 0.03 cm. The extract release volume (ERV) increased in all samples during storage. The least ERV of 11.7 and 11.6 ml were recorded in samples inoculated with MV of T1 and T2, respectively. The tyrosine (TV) and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) number of turmeric treated samples were significantly lower than non turmeric treated samples. The samples inoculated with LS had the least TV of 30.9 mg tyrosine/100 g of meat and TBA number of 0.06 mg manoladehyde/kg of meat. Samples inoculated with MV and LS of both T1 and T2 were better in physico-chemical qualities.

Keywords: Carabeef, Pastirma, Micrococcus varians, Lactobacillus sakei, Staphylococcus carnosus, Physicochemical quality, Turmeric

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (630K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Aksu M.I., Kaya M. The effect of starter culture use in pastirma production on the properties of end product. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci. 2001;25:847–854.[Google Scholar]
  • Aksu M.I., Kaya M. Effect of commercial starter cultures on the fatty acid composition of pastirma (Turkish dry meat product) J Food Sci. 2002;67:2342–2345. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09551.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aksu M.I., Kaya M. Some microbiological and chemical properties of pastirma produced using potassium nitrate and starter culture. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci. 2002;26:25–132.[Google Scholar]
  • Andersen L. Biopreservation with FloraCarn L-2. Fleischwirtschaft. 1995;75:1327–1329.[Google Scholar]
  • Export Statistics. New Delhi: Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • Boschkova K, Danchev S, Kostov K (1983) Use of starter cultures in the production of raw-dried non-comminuted pork products. II. Influence of starter cultures upon the hydrophilic properties of raw-dried non-comminuted pork products. In: Proc 29th Euro Cong Meat Res Work, Salsomaggiore, France, p 227
  • Chapman G.H. The significance of sodium chloride in studies of staphylococci. J Bacteriol. 1945;50:201–203.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Production Statistics. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • Goma M., Zain G.N., Dessouki T.M., Thabet F.M., Bakr A. Influence of pepsin proteolytic enzyme on the microbiological changes and lipids oxidation during manufacturing of pastirma from camel meat. Res Bull Nr. 1978;902:17.[Google Scholar]
  • Grau R., Hamm R. Effect of pH adjustment with phosphates on attributes and functionalities of normal and high pH beef. Natuirwissenschaft. 1953;40:29–35. doi: 10.1007/BF00595734. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harrigan W.F., McCance M.E. Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology. London: Academic Press; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • Montel MC, Talon R, Cantonnet M, Fournaud J (1992) Identification of Staphylococcus from french dry sausage. In: Proc 37th Int Cong Meat Sci Technol, Kulmbach, Germany, p 595–601
  • Pearson D. Assessing beef acceptability. Food Manuf. 1967;42:42–47.[Google Scholar]
  • Pearson D. Application of chemical methods for the assessment of beef quality. II. Methods related to protein breakdown. J Sci Food Agric. 1968;19:366–369. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740190703. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pippen E.L., De Fremery D., Lineweaver H., Hanson H.L. Chicken broth flavor and pH. Poult Sci. 1965;44:816–822. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Salama N.A., Khalafalla G.M. Microbiological and chemical studies during basterma cured meat processing. Archiv Lebensmittelhyg. 1987;38(2):56–61.[Google Scholar]
  • Smith J.L., Palumbo S.A. Use of starter cultures in meat. J Food Prot. 1983;46:997–1006.[Google Scholar]
  • Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. Statistical methods. 7th edn. Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • Strange E.D., Benedict R.C., Smith J.L., Swift C.E. Evaluation of rapid tests for monitoring alterations in meat quality during storage. J Food Prot. 1977;40:843–848.[Google Scholar]
  • Witte V.C., Krause G.F., Bailey M.E. A new extraction method for determining 2-TBA values of pork and beef during storage. J Food Sci. 1970;35:582–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb04815.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, P.O. Khanapara, Guwahati, 781 022 India
R. N. Borpuzari, Email: moc.oohay@irazuprobnr.
Corresponding author.
Received 2008 Jun 17; Accepted 2009 Jun 27.
Full Text
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.