Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Journal: 1986/March - The Lancet
ISSN: 0140-6736
PUBMED: 2868172
Abstract:
In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
Relations:
Citations
(7K+)
Clinical trials
(10)
Organisms
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.