Molecular phenotyping for analyzing subtle genetic effects in mice: application to an angiotensinogen gene titration.
Journal: 2002/April - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 0027-8424
Abstract:
The angiotensinogen M235T polymorphism in humans is linked to differential expression of the human angiotensinogen gene (AGT) gene and hypertension, but the homeostatic responses resulting from this polymorphism are not known. We therefore investigated how mice respond to five genetically determined levels of mouse angiotensinogen gene (Agt) expression covering the range associated with the M235T variants. By using high-throughput molecular phenotyping, tissue RNAs were assayed for expression of 10 genes important in hypertension. Significant positive and negative responses occurred in both sexes as Agt expression increased twofold, including a three-fold increase in aldosterone synthase expression in adrenal gland, and a two-fold decrease in renin expression in kidney. In males, cardiac expression of the precursor of atrial natriuretic peptide B and of adrenomedullin also increased approximately twofold. The relative expression of all genes studied except Agt differed significantly in the two sexes, and several unexpected relationships were encountered. A highly significant correlation between renal expression of the angiotensin type 1a receptor and kallikrein, independent of Agt genotype, is present in females (P < 0.0001) but not males (P = 0.4). The correlation between blood pressure (BP) and liver Agt expression within the five Agt genotypes is significant in females (P = 0.0005) but not in males (P = 0.2), whereas correlation of BP with differences between the genotypes is less in females (P = 0.06) than in males (P = 0.001). The marked gender differences in gene expression in wild-type mice and the changes induced by moderate alterations in Agt expression and BP emphasize the need to look for similar differences in humans.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(70)
References
(26)
Chemicals
(1)
Organisms
(3)
Processes
(2)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(7): 4602-4607

Molecular phenotyping for analyzing subtle genetic effects in mice: Application to an angiotensinogen gene titration

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525
To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: ude.cnu.dem@miksh.
Present address: The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609.
Contributed by Oliver Smithies
Contributed by Oliver Smithies
Accepted 2002 Feb 12.

Abstract

The angiotensinogen M235T polymorphism in humans is linked to differential expression of the human angiotensinogen gene (AGT) gene and hypertension, but the homeostatic responses resulting from this polymorphism are not known. We therefore investigated how mice respond to five genetically determined levels of mouse angiotensinogen gene (Agt) expression covering the range associated with the M235T variants. By using high-throughput molecular phenotyping, tissue RNAs were assayed for expression of 10 genes important in hypertension. Significant positive and negative responses occurred in both sexes as Agt expression increased twofold, including a three-fold increase in aldosterone synthase expression in adrenal gland, and a two-fold decrease in renin expression in kidney. In males, cardiac expression of the precursor of atrial natriuretic peptide B and of adrenomedullin also increased approximately twofold. The relative expression of all genes studied except Agt differed significantly in the two sexes, and several unexpected relationships were encountered. A highly significant correlation between renal expression of the angiotensin type 1a receptor and kallikrein, independent of Agt genotype, is present in females (P < 0.0001) but not males (P = 0.4). The correlation between blood pressure (BP) and liver Agt expression within the five Agt genotypes is significant in females (P = 0.0005) but not in males (P = 0.2), whereas correlation of BP with differences between the genotypes is less in females (P = 0.06) than in males (P = 0.001). The marked gender differences in gene expression in wild-type mice and the changes induced by moderate alterations in Agt expression and BP emphasize the need to look for similar differences in humans.

Abstract

Essential hypertension is a deleterious condition with a multifactorial etiology that includes both genetic and environmental determinants. However, despite decades of intense research into the physiological mechanisms that regulate blood pressure (BP), the primary genetic determinants of essential hypertension remain elusive. A substantial source of the difficulties associated with attempts to understand the regulation of BP is the existence of sophisticated homeostatic systems that permit desirable physiological changes in biological variables in vivo but prevent the changes from extending into pathological ranges. These homeostatic changes, combined with environmental effects and the difficulties of obtaining measurements of BP sufficiently precise to detect small differences, make dissection of the hypertensive phenotype difficult.

Because humans are genetically very heterogenous, polymorphic forms of genes are common. Consequently, among the polymorphic forms, it is reasonable to expect that different alleles will exist that dictate expression at different intrinsic levels. Such genetic variations may cause BP changes if the recruiting homeostatic adjustments are incomplete. The M235 and T235 alleles of the human angiotensinogen gene (AGT), described by Jeunemaitre et al. (1), affect BP. Thus, it is important to understand in detail the homeostatic adjustments that occur in response to this type of genetic alteration and to identify genes that are called into action during homeostasis. The responding genes themselves then become candidates for having effects on BP. Obviously, however, a precise analysis of this type is difficult in humans because of their heterogeneous genetic background.

For these reasons, we have recently been carrying out experiments in mice with the aim of identifying genes whose quantitative expression affects BP or induces homeostatic compensations. To do this, we first use targeted gene disruption and gene duplication to generate mice having different numbers of the target gene (2) and then use this “gene titration” series of mice to uncover changes that directly influence BP and those that represent homeostatic compensations. Our first application of this strategy has centered on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which plays a central role in salt and water homeostasis and the maintenance of vascular tone. Angiotensinogen (AGT) is the sole source of angiotensin II (Ang II), the most active peptide of the RAS, which is produced from AGT by the serial actions of renin and the angiotensin-converting enzyme. Of all of the components in the RAS, AGT is the one most definitively identified as genetically important in the causation of essential hypertension in humans (1, 3) and in animals (46).

The mice we have studied here carry one, two, three, or four functional copies of the murine wild-type mouse angiotensinogen gene (Agt) at its normal chromosomal location (2, 6). Plasma AGT levels increase progressively from 35% in the one-copy mice to 145% of normal in the four-copy animals, and their BPs show significant and almost linear increases of ≈8 mmHg (1 mmHg = 133 Pa) per gene copy, even though their normal homeostatic systems are intact. Thus, the ranges of AGT alteration and BP in the mice include those observed in humans with variant AGT alleles. We have reported on the nature of the homeostatic compensations that occur in the one-copy mice (7). In the present article we extend this work to include increases as well as decreases in the expression of AGT, and we move from studying expression at the level of proteins and peptides to the study of expression at the level of mRNA. We do so for several reasons. First, the quantitation of the proteins and peptides requires a unique method for each component. Second, distinguishing between related components is often difficult. Third, sensitivities and precision are not always adequate. Fourth, high-throughput determinations are only available for some components. These difficulties can all be circumvented in experimental animals when expression is studied at the mRNA level and quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR is used in conjunction with automated RNA preparation. Our application of this molecular phenotyping system to animals in the Agt gene titration series illustrates its power for recognizing subtle phenotypic changes in animals with minimal genetic differences and reveals several unexpected findings.

Values are pg/μg of total RNA ± SEM; n = 5 for each genotype and gender.

Click here to view.

Acknowledgments

We thank Thomas M. Coffman, Howard A. Rockman, Mei-Hong Lin, Emily Riggs, Hui-Ying Li, and Jenny Holt for their help and advice. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM20069, HL49277, and HL65184 (to O.S.).

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

RASrenin-angiotensin system
Ang IIangiotensin II
BPblood pressure
AGTangiotensinogen
RTreverse transcription
Abbreviations

References

  • 1. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev Y V, Lifton R P, Williams C S, Charru A, Hunt S C, Hopkins P N, Williams R R, Lalouel J-M, Corvol P. Cell. 1992;71:169–180.[PubMed]
  • 2. Smithies O, Kim H-S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:3612–3615.
  • 3. Watt G C M, Harrap S B, Foy C J W, Holton D W, Edwards H V, Davidson H R, Connor J M, Lever A F, Fraser R. J Hypertens. 1992;10:473–482.[PubMed]
  • 4. Ohkubo H, Kawakami H, Kakehi Y, Takumi T, Arai H, Yokota Y, Iwai M, Tanabe Y, Masu M, Hata J, et al Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:5153–5157.[Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kimura S, Mullins J J, Bunnemann B, Metzger R, Hilgenfeldt U, Zimmermann F, Jacob H, Fuxe K, Ganten D, Kaling M. EMBO J. 1992;11:821–827.
  • 6. Kim H-S, Krege J H, Kluckman K D, Hagaman J R, Hodgin J B, Best C F, Jennette J C, Coffman T M, Maeda N, Smithies O. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:2735–2739.
  • 7. Kim H-S, Maeda N, Oh G T, Fernandez L G, Gomez R A, Smithies O. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:14210–14217.[PubMed]
  • 8. Gibson U E M, Heid C A, Williams P M. Genome Res. 1996;6:995–1001.[PubMed]
  • 9. Mckenna T J, Island D P, Nicholson W E, Liddle G W. J Steroid Biochem. 1978;9:967–972.[PubMed]
  • 10. Inoue I, Nakajima T, Williams C S, Quachenbush J, Puryear R, Power M, Cheng T, Ludwig E H, Sharma A M, Hata A, et al J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1786–1797.[Google Scholar]
  • 11. Jeunemaitre X, Inoue I, Williams C, Charru A, Tichet J, Powers M, Sharma A M, Gimenez-Roqueplo A P, Hata A, Corvol P, Lalouel J M. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:1448–1460.
  • 12. Kotchen T A, Guthrie G P., Jr Endocr Rev. 1980;1:78–99.[PubMed]
  • 13. Lifton R P, Dluhy R G, Powers M, Rich G M, Cook S, Ulick S, Lalouel J-M. Nature (London) 1992;355:262–265.[PubMed]
  • 14. Stowasser M, Bachmann A W, Huggard P R, Rossetti T R, Gordon R D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2160–2166.[PubMed]
  • 15. Hirata Y, Matsumoto A, Aoyagi T, Yamaoki K, Komuro I, Suzuki T, Ashida T, Sugiyama T, Hada Y, Kuwajima I, et al Cardiovasc Res. 2001;51:585–591.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. Oliver P M, Fox J E, Kim R, Rockman H A, Kim H-S, Reddick R L, Pandey K M, Milgram S L, Smithies O, Maeda N. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:14730–14735.
  • 17. Nakayama T, Soma M, Takahashi Y, Rehemudula D, Kanmatsuse K, Furuya K. Circ Res. 2000;86:841–845.[PubMed]
  • 18. Leeuwen van B H, Evans B A, Tregear G W, Richards R I. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:5529–5535.[PubMed]
  • 19. Jost J P, Seldran M, Geiser M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:429–433.
  • 20. Saluz H P, Jiricny I, Jost J P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:7167–7171.
  • 21. Peale F V, Ludwig L B, Zain S, Hilf R, Bambara R A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:1038–1042.
  • 22. Gaillard I, Clauser E, Corvol P. DNA. 1989;8:87–99.[PubMed]
  • 23. Clouston W M, Evans B A, Haralambidis J, Richards R I. Genomics. 1988;2:240–248.[PubMed]
  • 24. Lynch K R, Peach M J. Hypertension. 1991;17:263–269.[PubMed]
  • 25. Ward K, Hata A, Jeunemaitre X, Helin C, Nelson L, Namikawa C, Farrington P F, Ogasawara M, Suzumori K, Tomoda S, et al Nat Genet. 1993;4:59–61.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ohkubo H, Nakayama K, Tanaka T, Nakanishi S. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:319–323.[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.