Aberrant methylation of SPARC in human lung cancers.
Journal: 2005/April - British journal of cancer
ISSN: 0007-0920
Abstract:
SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) is an extracellular Ca2+-binding matricellular glycoprotein associated with the regulation of cell adhesion and growth. We investigated loss of expression of SPARC gene and promoter methylation in lung cancers and correlated the data with clinicopathological features. We observed loss of SPARC expression in 12 of 20 (60%) lung cancer cell lines. Treatment of expression-negative cell lines with a demethylating agent restored expression in all cases. Methylation frequencies of SPARC gene were 55% in 20 lung cancer cell lines. Primary tumours had methylation at a rate of 69% (119 of 173), while nonmalignant lung tissues (n=60) had very low rates (3%). In lung adenocarcinomas, SPARC methylation correlated with a negative prognosis (P=0.0021; relative risk 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.75-12.35, multivariate Cox's proportional-hazard model). Immunostaining revealed protein expression in bronchial epithelium (weak intensity) and in juxtatumoral stromal tissues (strong intensity) accompanied by frequent loss in cancer cells that correlated with the presence of methylation (P<0.001). Our findings are of biological interest and potentially of clinical importance in human lung cancers.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(25)
References
(41)
Patents
(9)
Grants
(315)
Chemicals
(3)
Diseases
(2)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(4)
Anatomy
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
British Journal of Cancer. Mar/7/2005; 92(5): 942-948
Published online Feb/28/2005

Aberrant methylation of SPARC in human lung cancers

Abstract

SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) is an extracellular Ca2+-binding matricellular glycoprotein associated with the regulation of cell adhesion and growth. We investigated loss of expression of SPARC gene and promoter methylation in lung cancers and correlated the data with clinicopathological features. We observed loss of SPARC expression in 12 of 20 (60%) lung cancer cell lines. Treatment of expression-negative cell lines with a demethylating agent restored expression in all cases. Methylation frequencies of SPARC gene were 55% in 20 lung cancer cell lines. Primary tumours had methylation at a rate of 69% (119 of 173), while nonmalignant lung tissues (n=60) had very low rates (3%). In lung adenocarcinomas, SPARC methylation correlated with a negative prognosis (P=0.0021; relative risk 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.75–12.35, multivariate Cox's proportional-hazard model). Immunostaining revealed protein expression in bronchial epithelium (weak intensity) and in juxtatumoral stromal tissues (strong intensity) accompanied by frequent loss in cancer cells that correlated with the presence of methylation (P<0.001). Our findings are of biological interest and potentially of clinical importance in human lung cancers.

The matricellular protein SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine), also known as osteonectin/BM-40, is a calcium-binding glycoprotein that shows a high degree of interspecies sequence conservation and plays an important role in cell–matrix interactions during tissue remodelling, wound repair, morphogenesis, cellular differentiation, cell migration, and angiogenesis (Sage et al, 1989; Jendraschak and Sage, 1996; Yan and Sage, 1999; Bradshaw and Sage, 2001; Brekken and Sage, 2001). Its role in tumorigenesis is complex, and expression is often being downregulated in tumour cells accompanied by upregulation in juxtatumoral stromal cells. SPARC is highly expressed in reactive fibroblasts, and expression is deregulated in many types of human malignant tumours (Porte et al, 1995; Le Bail et al, 1999; Rempel et al, 1999; Paley et al, 2000). SPARC may promote vascularisation of tumours, tumour progression, or invasiveness by modulating the activity of cytokines and stimulating secretion of tissue remodelling metalloproteases (Lane and Sage, 1994; Motamed and Sage, 1997; Sage, 1997). Owing to the correlation between expression and invasion, SPARC was thought to be a proinvasive protein (Everitt and Sage, 1992a, 1992b; Lane et al, 1994; Ledda et al, 1997). However, ovarian cancer cells treated with SPARC showed inhibition of cell proliferation and underwent apoptosis (Yiu et al, 2001). SPARC potently inhibited angiogenesis and significantly impaired neuroblastoma tumour growth in vivo (Chlenski et al, 2002). Implanted Lewis lung carcinoma cells grew more rapidly in SPARC null mice (Brekken et al, 2003). Thus, the exact role of SPARC in tumour growth and progression is unclear.

DNA methylation is a major mechanism associated with the inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in cancer (Esteller et al, 2001; Jones and Baylin, 2002; Suzuki et al, 2004). It has been reported that SPARC is silenced through DNA methylation in pancreatic cancer cells (Sato et al, 2003). SPARC protein by immunostaining was overexpressed in stromal fibroblasts immediately adjacent to the neoplastic epithelium in pancreatic cancers, suggesting SPARC expression in juxtatumoral tissues is regulated through tumour–stromal interactions (Sato et al, 2003). As exogenous SPARC inhibits the growth of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro, tumour–stromal interactions of SPARC may act to facilitate or retard tumour progression (Sato et al, 2003).

In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SPARC expression by immunostaining was also found strongly in stromal fibroblasts, persistently in chondrocytes of bronchial cartilage, weakly in bronchial epithelium, but not in alveolar cells nor in tumour cells (Koukourakis et al, 2003). SPARC, is located at 5q33.1, a region that demonstrates frequent loss of heterozygosity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Girard et al, 2000; Demopoulos et al, 2002).

In this study, we examined the mRNA expression and methylation of SPARC in lung cancer cell lines, and examined the methylation and protein by immunostaining in primary tumours. We correlated these findings with clinicopathologic features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell lines and tumour samples

We studied 12 NSCLC cell lines (NCI-H460, NCI-H1437, NCI-H1770, NCI-H2087, NCI-H2122, NCI-H2126, HCC15, HCC95, HCC193, HCC366, HCC515, HCC1171) and eight SCLC cell lines (NCI-H69, NCI-H146, NCI-H209, NCI-H211, NCI-H524, NCI-H526, NCI-H1672, NCI-H2171) that were established by us (Phelps et al, 1996), several of which are deposited in the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Cell cultures were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Life Technologies Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cell lines established at the National Cancer Institute have the prefix NCI, while those established at UT Southwestern Medical Center have the prefix HCC. Nonmalignant human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBEC) were cultured as reported previously (Toyooka et al, 2002), and normal trachea RNA was obtained from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Surgically resected samples were obtained from patients with lung cancer who had not received treatment prior to resection at the Chiba University Hospital, Japan, after obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent. Samples were immediately frozen and stored at −80°C until used.

Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) assay

An RT–PCR assay was used to examine SPARC mRNA expression. Total RNA was extracted from the samples with Trizol (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. RT reaction was performed on 4 μg total RNA with deoxyribonuclease I and the SuperScript II First-Strand Synthesis using oligo-(dT) primer System (Life Technologies), and aliquots of the reaction mixture were used for the subsequent PCR amplification. The forward PCR amplification primer of SPARC was 5′-AAGATCCATGAGAATGAGAAG-3′ (Ex8-S), and the reverse primer 5′-AAAAGCGGGTGGTGCAATG-3′ (Ex9-AS) (Accession number NM_003118; forward, nucleotides 649–669; reverse, nucleotides 847–865). These sequences are separated by an intron, and we confirmed that genomic DNA was not amplified with these primers. Polymerase chain reaction amplification was carried out for 12 min at 95°C for initial denaturation, followed by 33 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s. The housekeeping gene GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was used as an internal control to confirm the success of the RT reaction. The primers for GAPDH amplification were as follows: forward primer, 5′-CACTGGCGTCTTCACCACCATG-3′; and reverse primer, 5′-GCTTCACCACCTTCTTGATGTCA-3′. Polymerase chain reaction amplification was carried out for 12 min at 95°C for initial denaturation, followed by 25 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 65°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 30 s. These primer sequences were identical to the human target genes as confirmed by a BLAST search. Polymerase chain reaction products were analysed on 2% agarose gels. Nonmalignant human bronchial and normal trachea were used as normal controls for RT–PCR.

5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR) treatment

In all, 11 tumour cell lines with SPARC hypermethylation and absent gene expression were incubated in culture medium with 4 μM 5-Aza-CdR for 6 days, with medium changes on days 1, 3, and 5. The cells were harvested and RNA was extracted at day 6.

DNA extraction and methylation-specific PCR (MSP)

Genomic DNA was obtained from cell lines, cultured nonmalignant cells, primary tumours, and nonmalignant tissues by digestion with proteinase K (Life Technologies), followed by phenol/chloroform (1 : 1) extraction (Herrmann and Frischauf, 1987). DNA methylation patterns in the CpG island of SPARC were determined by the method of MSP as reported by Herman et al (1996). Primer sequences of SPARC for unmethyalted reaction were 5′-TTTTTTAGATTGTTTGGAGAGTG-3′ (sense) and 5′-AACTAACAACATAAACAAAAATATC-3′ (antisense), and for the methylated reaction, 5′-GAGAGCGCGTTTTGTTTGTC-3′ (sense) and 5′-AACGACGTAAACGAAAATATCG-3′ (antisense) (Sato et al, 2003). Briefly, 1 μg of genomic DNA was denatured by NaOH and modified by bisulfite. The modified DNA was purified using Wizard DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), treated with NaOH to desulphonate, precipitated with ethanol, and resuspended in water. Polymerase chain reaction amplification was carried out for 12 min at 95°C for initial denaturation, followed by 38 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 62°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 30 s. DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes (n=14) from healthy nonsmoking subjects was used as negative controls for methylation-specific assays. DNA from lymphocytes of a healthy volunteer treated with Sss1 methyltransferase (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA, USA) and then subjected to bisulfite treatment was used as a positive control for methylated alleles. Water blanks were included with each assay. Polymerase chain reaction products were visualised on 2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.

Immunostaining

SPARC was detected on paraffin-embedded tissue sections by the avidin–biotin peroxidase complex method using a mouse monoclonal antibody generated against the N-terminal region of SPARC (AON-5031; Hematologic Technologies Inc., Essex Junction, VT, USA). After immunostaining, the sections were counterstained with haematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted.

Immunostaining was graded by two independent observers unaware of clinical or laboratory findings. Staining was categorised from 0 to 4+ based on the percentage of cells stained. Score 0 was assigned if less than 5% of cells were positive. A weak staining (+1) was assigned if 6–25% of cells were positive, a moderate staining (2+) was assigned if 26–50% of cells were positive, high sore (3+) was assigned if 51–75% of cells were positive, and a very high score (+4) was assigned if more than 75% of cells stained positive. The degree of staining intensity was also noted.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences between groups were examined using Fisher's exact test, χ2 test, and Mann–Whitney test. Survival was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis until death or the date of the last follow-up (censored). Survival was analysed according to the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences in their distribution were evaluated by means of the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox's proportional-hazard model was developed to evaluate the covariates' joint effects. All P's are two-sided, and P of less than 0.05 was defined as being statistically significant.

RESULTS

Aberrant methylation and expression of SPARC in cell lines

Expression of SPARC was examined by RT–PCR, and representative examples are shown in Figure 1A. SPARC expression was present in NHBEC and normal trachea. However, loss of SPARC expression was observed in 10 of 12 (83%) NSCLC cell lines, and two of eight (25%) SCLC cell lines (Table 1 and Figure 1B). Aberrant methylation was absent in DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy nonsmoking volunteers (n=14) and NHBEC. Aberrant methylation was found in nine of 12 (75%) NSCLC cell lines, and two of eight (25%) SCLC cell lines. Both loss of expression and lack of methylation of SPARC were found in NSCLC cell line NCI-H2126, suggesting an alterative method of gene silencing in this cell line. The concordance between loss of gene expression and aberrant methylation of SPARC was 92% in NSCLC cell lines, and 100% in SCLC cell lines (overall concordance 95%).

5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine treatment

Nine NSCLC cell lines (NCI-H460, NCI-H1437, NCI-H2087, NCI-H2122, HCC15, HCC95, HCC366, HCC515, HCC1171) and two SCLC cell lines (NCI-H146, NCI-H211) that showed loss of expression and methylation of SPARC were cultured with the demethylating agent 5-Aza-CdR. SPARC expression was restored after treatment in all 11 methylated cell lines tested (Figure 1C).

Aberrant methylation of SPARC in primary tumours

Results of aberrant methylation of SPARC in primary tumours and nonmalignant tissues are detailed in Table 1 and Figure 1D. SPARC methylation was a tumour-specific event in lung cancers (P=0.0001) when compared with corresponding adjacent nonmalignant tissues.

Of 173 lung cancers, 119 (69%) were found to be methylated. There was a significant relationship between the major histologic types of lung cancer, NSCLC (115 of 161, 71%) and SCLC (four of 12, 33%) (P=0.01). When compared with clinicopathologic data, there was no significant association with gender, age, smoking history, or tumour stage. However, the frequency of methylation was significantly higher in squamous cell carcinomas (52 of 61, 85%) compared to adenocarcinomas (57 of 84, 68%) (P=0.01). Overall survival of adenocarcinomas was poorer in patients with SPARC methylation than in those without methylation (P=0.008; log-rank test; Figure 2) and for patients with advanced stages (P=0.0005). In a multivariate Cox's proportional-hazard model, promoter methylation of SPARC was an independent adverse prognostic factor (P=0.0021; relative risk (RR) 4.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75–12.35) next to stage (P=0.0003; RR 4.44, 95% CI 1.98–9.90) in adenocarcinoma cases (Table 2).

Immunostaining of SPARC protein in lung cancer

The expression of SPARC protein was examined in 162 primary lung cancers by immunostaining (Figure 3). In nonmalignant lung tissues, 73 of 128 cases (57%), negative (0) to weak (1+) SPARC expression was found in bronchial epithelial cell, while moderate (2+) to very strong (4+) expression was found in 55 cases. Alveolar cells were negative except for one case, which showed weak expression. Stromal fibroblasts distant from tumours showed negative to weak expression. Inflammatory cells including lymphocytes were negative expression, while chondrocytes of bronchial cartilage were moderate (2+) to strong (4+) SPARC expression. In 132 of 162 cases, negative (0) to weak (1+) SPARC expression was found in the cancer cells, while moderate (2+) to strong (4+) SPARC expression was found in 30 cases. Moderate (2+) to very strong (4+) SPARC expression was found in 154 of 162 cases in stromal cells near to or surrounding cancer cells. Thus, the predominant immunostaining pattern was negative in tumour cells while being positive in corresponding juxtatumoural stromal cells (125 of 162, 77%). However, there was no correlation of immunostaining pattern between tumour cells and stromal cells (Table 3A). Immunostaining pattern of neither tumour cells nor stromal cells correlated with patients' survival (data not shown). Of 162 cases, 105 showed loss (0) or weak (1+) expression of SPARC protein and methylation of SPARC gene, and 19 cases showed moderate (2+) to very strong (4+) expression without methylation (Table 3B). Thus, the concordance between methylation and loss of gene expression in tumour cells was 77% (P<0.0001). There was no correlation between tumour methylation and stromal cell immunostaining.

DISCUSSION

Sato et al demonstrated downregulation of SPARC mRNA in pancreatic cancer cells through DNA methylation (Sato et al, 2003). In our study, we observed that decreased SPARC expression in lung cancer cell lines is associated with DNA methylation of the gene promoter, and it is re-expressed by treatment with the demethylating agent 5-Aza-CdR in lung cancer cell lines. Although there are other possible mechanisms for downregulation of SPARC expression, the excellent concordance between mRNA expression by RT–PCR or protein expression by immunostaining and DNA methylation of SPARC indicates that the gene is downregulated mainly through DNA methylation in lung cancer.

As with other tumours, SPARC is downregulated in lung cancer cells while being upregulated in juxtatumoural stromal cells. Upregulation was unusual in stromal cells distant from the tumour. These findings result in a complex pattern of simultaneous selective downregulation in a specific cell type (tumour cells) accompanied by selective upregulation in adjacent stromal cells. A similar pattern has been previously described in ovarian, pancreatic, and lung cancers (Brown et al, 1999; Koukourakis et al, 2003; Sato et al, 2003). Our findings demonstrate that the mechanism of downregulation of SPARC in lung cancer cells is due to methylation. The dual up- and downregulation of SPARC in tumours makes interpretation difficult, while its role in tumorigenesis remains controversial. SPARC may function similar to TGFβ, where signaling is downregulated in cancer cells early in tumorigenesis, but is overexpressed at later stages, thus acting either as tumour suppressor or oncogene, depending on the tumour stage (Wakefield and Roberts, 2002). Our data indicate that tumour–host interactions between lung cancer cells and stromal cells through SPARC protein play an important role in the pathogenesis of lung cancers.

Our data demonstrated that methylation of SPARC gene in tumour cells had poorer prognosis in lung adenocarcinomas, whereas reactivity of stromal fibroblasts had been reported to correlate worse prognosis in NSCLC (Koukourakis et al, 2003). The expression of SPARC in cancer tissues or functional analyses of SPARC gene in tumour cell lines have been widely studied (Table 4). Expression, as analysed by RT–PCR or immunostaining, was downregulated in lung, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers, whereas it was upregulated in oesophageal, bladder, metastatic prostate, hepatocellular cancers, and invasive meningiomas and malignant melanomas, and some of those findings were supported by functional analyses. The expression of SPARC by both normal and tumour cells is highly dependent on tumour type and culture conditions. Expression of SPARC in cancer tissues correlated with poor prognosis in malignant melanoma, bladder, and oesophageal carcinoma as also reported by others, although some of these reports was analysed by RT–PCR using whole specimens (Massi et al, 1999; Yamanaka et al, 2001; Yamashita et al, 2003). Aberrant expression of SPARC in primary tumours may result in negative prognosis.

In conclusion, SPARC was downregulated in cancer cells through DNA methylation and overexpressed in its stromal cells of lung cancer, and DNA methylation correlated with prognosis in adenocarcinomas. DNA methylation of SPARC may play a role in the pathogenesis of lung cancers.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the UT Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Lung Cancer (P50CA70907) and Early Detection Research Network, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

References

  • 1. BrabenderJLordRVMetzgerRParkJSalongaDDanenbergKDDanenbergPVHolscherAHSchneiderPMDifferential SPARC mRNA expression in Barrett's oesophagusBr J Cancer20038915081512[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. BradshawADSageEHSPARC, a matricellular protein that functions in cellular differentiation and tissue response to injuryJ Clin Invest200110710491054[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. BrekkenRAPuolakkainenPGravesDCWorkmanGLubkinSRSageEHEnhanced growth of tumors in SPARC null mice is associated with changes in the ECMJ Clin Invest2003111487495[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. BrekkenRASageEHSPARC, a matricellular protein: at the crossroads of cell-matrix communicationMatrix Biol200119816827[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. BriggsJChamboredonSCastellazziMKerryJABosTJTranscriptional upregulation of SPARC, in response to c-Jun overexpression, contributes to increased motility and invasion of MCF7 breast cancer cellsOncogene20022170777091[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. BrownTJShawPAKarpXHuynhMHBegleyHRinguetteMJActivation of SPARC expression in reactive stroma associated with human epithelial ovarian cancerGynecol Oncol1999752533[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. ChlenskiALiuSCrawfordSEVolpertOVDeVriesGHEvangelistaAYangQSalwenHRFarrerRBrayJCohnSLSPARC is a key Schwannian-derived inhibitor controlling neuroblastoma tumor angiogenesisCancer Res20026273577363[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. DeSChenJNarizhnevaNVHestonWBrainardJSageEHByzovaTVMolecular pathway for cancer metastasis to boneJ Biol Chem20032783904439050[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. DemopoulosKArvanitisDAVassilakisDASiafakasNMSpandidosDAMYCL1, FHIT, SPARC, pl6(INK4) and TP53 genes associated to lung cancer in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisJ Cell Mol Med20026215222[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. EstellerMCornPGBaylinSBHermanJGA gene hypermethylation profile of human cancerCancer Res20016132253229[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. EverittEASageEHExpression of SPARC is correlated with altered morphologies in transfected F9 embryonal carcinoma cellsExp Cell Res1992a199134146[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. EverittEASageEHOverexpression of SPARC in stably transfected F9 cells mediates attachment and spreading in Ca(2+)-deficient mediumBiochem Cell Biol1992b7013681379[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. GirardLZochbauer-MullerSVirmaniAKGazdarAFMinnaJDGenome-wide allelotyping of lung cancer identifies new regions of allelic loss, differences between small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, and loci clusteringCancer Res20006048944906[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. HermanJGGraffJRMyohanenSNelkinBDBaylinSBMethylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islandsProc Natl Acad Sci USA19969398219826[Google Scholar]
  • 15. HerrmannBGFrischaufAMIsolation of genomic DNAMethods Enzymol1987152180183[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. JendraschakESageEHRegulation of angiogenesis by SPARC and angiostatin: implications for tumor cell biologySemin Cancer Biol19967139146[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. JonesPABaylinSBThe fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancerNat Rev Genet20023415428[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. KoukourakisMIGiatromanolakiABrekkenRASivridisEGatterKCHarrisALSageEHEnhanced expression of SPARC/osteonectin in the tumor-associated stroma of non-small cell lung cancer is correlated with markers of hypoxia/acidity and with poor prognosis of patientsCancer Res20036353765380[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. LaneTFIruela-ArispeMLJohnsonRSSageEHSPARC is a source of copper-binding peptides that stimulate angiogenesisJ Cell Biol1994125929943[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. LaneTFSageEHThe biology of SPARC, a protein that modulates cell-matrix interactionsFASEB J19948163173[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. Le BailBFaouziSBoussarieLGuirouilhJBlancJFCarlesJBioulac-SagePBalabaudCRosenbaumJOsteonectin/SPARC is overexpressed in human hepatocellular carcinomaJ Pathol19991894652[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 22. LeddaMFAdrisSBravoAIKairiyamaCBoverLChernajovskyYMordohJPodhajcerOLSuppression of SPARC expression by antisense RNA abrogates the tumorigenicity of human melanoma cellsNat Med19973171176[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. MassiDFranchiABorgognoniLRealiUMSantucciMOsteonectin expression correlates with clinical outcome in thin cutaneous malignant melanomasHum Pathol199930339344[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 24. MotamedKSageEHRegulation of vascular morphogenesis by the matricellular protein SPARCKidney Int19975113831387[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. PaleyPJGoffBAGownAMGreerBESageEHAlterations in SPARC and VEGF immunoreactivity in epithelial ovarian cancerGynecol Oncol200078336341[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. PhelpsRMJohnsonBEIhdeDCGazdarAFCarboneDPMcClintockPRLinnoilaRIMatthewsMJBunnPAJrCarneyDMinnaJDMulshineJLNCI-Navy Medical Oncology Branch cell line data baseJ Cell Biochem Suppl1996243291[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. PorteHChastreEPrevotSNordlingerBEmpereurSBassetPChambonPGespachCNeoplastic progression of human colorectal cancer is associated with overexpression of the stromelysin-3 and BM-40/SPARC genesInt J Cancer1995647075[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 28. RempelSAGeSGutierrezJASPARC: a potential diagnostic marker of invasive meningiomasClin Cancer Res19995237241[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 29. SageEHTerms of attachment: SPARC and tumorigenesisNat Med19973144146[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 30. SageHVernonRBFunkSEEverittEAAngelloJSPARC, a secreted protein associated with cellular proliferation, inhibits cell spreading in vitro and exhibits Ca+2-dependent binding to the extracellular matrixJ Cell Biol1989109341356[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 31. SatoNFukushimaNMaeharaNMatsubayashiHKoopmannJSuGHHrubanRHGogginsMSPARC/osteonectin is a frequent target for aberrant methylation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a mediator of tumor-stromal interactionsOncogene20032250215030[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 32. SchneiderSYochimJBrabenderJUchidaKDanenbergKDMetzgerRSchneiderPMSalongaDHolscherAHDanenbergPVOsteopontin but not osteonectin messenger RNA expression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected non-small cell lung cancerClin Cancer Res20041015881596[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 33. SchultzCLemkeNGeSGolembieskiWARempelSASecreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine promotes glioma invasion and delays tumor growth in vivoCancer Res20026262706277[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 34. SuzukiMSunagaNShamesDSToyookaSGazdarAFMinnaJDRNA interference-mediated knockdown of DNA methyltransferase 1 leads to promoter demethylation and gene re-expression in human lung and breast cancer cellsCancer Res20046431373143[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 35. ThomasRTrueLDBassukJALangePHVessellaRLDifferential expression of osteonectin/SPARC during human prostate cancer progressionClin Cancer Res2000611401149[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 36. ToyookaSFukuyamaYWistubaIITockmanMSMinnaJDGazdarAFDifferential expression of FEZ1/LZTS1 gene in lung cancers and their cell culturesClin Cancer Res2002822922297[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 37. WakefieldLMRobertsABTGF-beta signaling: positive and negative effects on tumorigenesisCurr Opin Genet Dev2002122229[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 38. YamanakaMKandaKLiNCFukumoriTOkaNKanayamaHOKagawaSAnalysis of the gene expression of SPARC and its prognostic value for bladder cancerJ Urol200116624952499[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 39. YamashitaKUpadhaySMimoriKInoueHMoriMClinical significance of secreted protein acidic and rich in cystein in esophageal carcinoma and its relation to carcinoma progressionCancer20039724122419[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 40. YanQSageEHSPARC, a matricellular glycoprotein with important biological functionsJ Histochem Cytochem19994714951506[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 41. YiuGKChanWYNgSWChanPSCheungKKBerkowitzRSMokSCSPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cellsAm J Pathol2001159609622[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals. Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.