A National Cancer Database Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Journal: 2018/November - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
ISSN: 1535-7732
Abstract:
To compare overall survival (OS) after radiofrequency (RF) ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) at high-volume centers in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Cases in the National Cancer Database of stage 1a and 1b NSCLC treated with primary RF ablation or SBRT from 2004 to 2014 were included. Patients treated at low-volume centers, defined as facilities below the 95th percentile in volume of cases performed, were excluded. Outcomes measured include OS and rate of 30-day readmission. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. Propensity score matched cohort analysis was performed. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
The final cohort comprised 4,454 cases of SBRT and 335 cases of RF ablation. Estimated median survival and follow-up were 38.8 months and 42.0 months, respectively. Patients treated with RF ablation had significantly more comorbidities (P < .001) and higher risk for an unplanned readmission within 30 days (hazard ratio = 11.536; P < .001). No difference in OS for the unmatched groups was found on multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = .285). No difference was found in the matched groups with 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 85.5%, 54.3%, and 31.9% in the SBRT group vs 89.3%, 52.7%, and 27.1% in the RF ablation group (P = .835).
No significant difference in OS was seen between patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with RF ablation and SBRT.
Relations:
Citations
(3)
Diseases
(2)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.